cardtrack

Best Pidgeotto Cards to Grade

The Pidgeotto cards worth grading, ranked by expected profit per submission — every grade outcome weighted by how often the card actually receives it — after current grading fees. The PSA 10 best case is shown on every row but does not decide the order. Top pick: Pidgeotto (Paldean Fates) at an expected +$6.

Worth grading6
With a gem-rate sample6100%
Positive expected value1
Median gem rate29.2%
PSA fees as of2026-09-26

Ranked by expected profit 6

Pidgeotto cards worth grading, ranked by expected grading profit
#CardRawPSA 9PSA 10CostBest caseGem rateExpectedSample
1PidgeottoPidgeottoPaldean Fates #197 · Current (2020–)
Expected +$6 per submission: 53.5% of 198 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($148), and only a PSA 10 covers the $86 you have in it — a 9 loses money. Confidence high on that sample.
$5$30$148$81+$6253.5%+$6198
high
2PidgeottoPidgeottoBase Set 2 #28 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected loss −$3 per submission: 21.6% of 204 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($284), and only a PSA 10 covers the $88 you have in it — a 9 loses money. Confidence high on that sample.
$5$42$284$83+$19621.6%−$3204
high
3PidgeottoPidgeottoBase #22 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected loss −$19 per submission: 16.4% of 1,463 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($276), and only a PSA 10 covers the $93 you have in it — a 9 loses money. Confidence high on that sample.
$10$52$276$83+$18416.4%−$191,463
high
4PidgeottoPidgeottoExpedition Base Set #88 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected loss −$21 per submission: 38.2% of 76 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($135), and only a PSA 10 covers the $94 you have in it — a 9 loses money. Confidence medium on that sample.
$13$38$135$81+$4138.2%−$2176
medium
5Koga's PidgeottoKoga's PidgeottoGym Challenge #27 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected loss −$30 per submission: 29.2% of 113 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($149), and only a PSA 10 covers the $90 you have in it — a 9 loses money. Confidence high on that sample.
$9$25$149$81+$5929.2%−$30113
high
6PidgeottoPidgeottoObsidian Flames #208 · Current (2020–)
Expected loss −$34 per submission: 18.6% of 4,097 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($222), and only a PSA 10 covers the $95 you have in it — a 9 loses money. Confidence high on that sample.
$13$25$222$82+$12718.6%−$344,097
high

Expected = every grade outcome weighted by its share of the card's graded population, minus the raw price and the grading cost (PSA tier fee for the graded value plus ~$20 round-trip shipping, fees as of 2026-09-26). Best case is the PSA 10 leg alone. Gem rates come from a self-selected population — collectors grade their cleanest copies — so read them as an upper bound. Raw is a blended market price, not a sale of your copy. Full method and filters on the grading index.

How to read the Pidgeotto ranking

Every Pidgeotto card listed here clears one bar: its PSA 10 price beats its raw price by more than the cost of grading it. 6 Pidgeotto printings pass. 6 of them (100%) have a gem-rate sample of at least ten graded copies in the population reports, and 1 of those keeps a positive expected value once every grade outcome is weighted by how often the card actually receives it.

The order is expected profit, not the PSA 10 best case, which rewards the widest raw-to-gem gap whether the card gems one time in two or one in fifty. Here the top row, the Pidgeotto from Paldean Fates, gems 53.5% of the time across 198 graded copies: +$6 is what a long run of submissions would average, $62 is what one lucky copy returns.

The median gem rate across the sampled Pidgeotto cards is 29.2%. Roughly one submitted copy in 3 came back PSA 10, and no row here covers raw price plus fee at PSA 9, so the gem rate decides whether a submission pays. Of the 6 ranked cards, 6 need a 10 to break even and 5 lose money on expectation. 5 rest on a hundred or more graded copies.

Before you submit a Pidgeotto card

Grading pays on condition. The four things every grader scores — centering, corners, edges and surface — can be checked at home before paying a fee, and a copy that is visibly off-centre or has a whitened corner will not gem whatever the population says. Those gem rates come from a self-selected population of clean copies, so a random copy does worse.

The cost column assumes a PSA submission at the tier covering the card's PSA 10 value, fees as of 2026-09-26, and raw is CardTrack's blended near-mint price, not a sale of your copy: pay more, or hold a lighter copy, and the break-even moves against you. Test a card with your own numbers in the ROI calculator, see the printings that fail the bar on the Pidgeotto card list, or see how gem-mint premiums run across the whole catalogue on the PSA premium index.

Pidgeotto grading questions

Which Pidgeotto card is the best to grade?
On current numbers the Pidgeotto (Paldean Fates #197): 53.5% of 198 graded copies came back PSA 10, an expected profit of $6 per submission after the $81 grading cost, against a best case of $62 if it gems.
How many Pidgeotto cards are worth grading?
1 keeps a positive expected value after the fee, out of the 6 with a gem-rate sample of at least ten graded copies. 6 cards on this page have a PSA 10 price that beats the raw price by more than the grading fee.
What gem rate do Pidgeotto cards get at PSA?
The median across the 6 sampled Pidgeotto cards is 29.2%, so about one in 3 of the copies collectors chose to submit came back PSA 10. The strongest rate with a sample of thirty or more is the Pidgeotto (Paldean Fates #197) at 53.5% of 198.
Does the Pidgeotto ranking apply to CGC or Beckett?
Not directly. The cost column is PSA's fee as of 2026-09-26 and the graded columns are PSA slab prices; the gem-rate sample falls back to CGC's population only when PSA has fewer than ten copies. A CGC or Beckett submission has its own fee and resale price.