cardtrack

Best Venomoth Cards to Grade

The Venomoth cards worth grading, ranked by expected profit per submission — every grade outcome weighted by how often the card actually receives it — after current grading fees. The PSA 10 best case is shown on every row but does not decide the order. Top pick: Venomoth (Skyridge) at an expected +$72.

Worth grading7
With a gem-rate sample7100%
Positive expected value1
Median gem rate27%
PSA fees as of2026-09-26

Ranked by expected profit 7

Venomoth cards worth grading, ranked by expected grading profit
#CardRawPSA 9PSA 10CostBest caseGem rateExpectedSample
1VenomothVenomothSkyridge #111 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected +$72 per submission: 51.7% of 120 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($240), and a PSA 9 ($104) still clears the $91 you have in it. Confidence high on that sample.
$9$104$240$82+$14951.7%+$72120
high
2Venomoth-GXVenomoth-GXUnbroken Bonds #216 · Modern (2011–2019)
Expected loss −$14 per submission: 46% of 248 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($144), and only a PSA 10 covers the $102 you have in it — a 9 loses money. Confidence high on that sample.
$21$50$144$81+$4146%−$14248
high
3Venomoth-GXVenomoth-GXUnbroken Bonds #193 · Modern (2011–2019)
Expected loss −$22 per submission: 57.1% of 184 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($98), and only a PSA 10 covers the $88 you have in it — a 9 loses money. Confidence high on that sample.
$7$29$98$81+$1057.1%−$22184
high
4VenomothVenomothJungle #13 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected loss −$41 per submission: 0.9% of 4,398 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($2,000), and a PSA 9 ($114) still clears the $267 you have in it. Confidence high on that sample.
$28$114$2,000$239+$1,7330.9%−$414,398
high
5Light VenomothLight VenomothNeo Destiny #53 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected loss −$43 per submission: 27% of 37 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($100), and only a PSA 10 covers the $86 you have in it — a 9 loses money. Confidence medium on that sample.
$5$28$100$81+$1427%−$4337
medium
6VenomothVenomothJungle #29 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected loss −$47 per submission: 15.6% of 417 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($135), and only a PSA 10 covers the $88 you have in it — a 9 loses money. Confidence high on that sample.
$7$39$135$81+$4715.6%−$47417
high
7Sabrina's VenomothSabrina's VenomothGym Heroes #34 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected loss −$63 per submission: 12.8% of 125 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($108), and only a PSA 10 covers the $89 you have in it — a 9 loses money. Confidence high on that sample.
$8$16$108$81+$1912.8%−$63125
high

Expected = every grade outcome weighted by its share of the card's graded population, minus the raw price and the grading cost (PSA tier fee for the graded value plus ~$20 round-trip shipping, fees as of 2026-09-26). Best case is the PSA 10 leg alone. Gem rates come from a self-selected population — collectors grade their cleanest copies — so read them as an upper bound. Raw is a blended market price, not a sale of your copy. Full method and filters on the grading index.

How to read the Venomoth ranking

Every Venomoth card listed here clears one bar: its PSA 10 price beats its raw price by more than the cost of grading it. 7 Venomoth printings pass. 7 of them (100%) have a gem-rate sample of at least ten graded copies in the population reports, and 1 of those keeps a positive expected value once every grade outcome is weighted by how often the card actually receives it.

The order is expected profit, not the PSA 10 best case, which rewards the widest raw-to-gem gap whether the card gems one time in two or one in fifty. Here the top row, the Venomoth from Skyridge, gems 51.7% of the time across 120 graded copies: +$72 is what a long run of submissions would average, $149 is what one lucky copy returns.

The median gem rate across the sampled Venomoth cards is 27%. Roughly one submitted copy in 4 came back PSA 10, and most rows here need that PSA 10 to cover raw price plus fee, so the gem rate decides whether a submission pays. Of the 7 ranked cards, 2 still cover raw price plus fee at PSA 9, 5 need a 10 to break even and 6 lose money on expectation. 6 rest on a hundred or more graded copies.

Before you submit a Venomoth card

Grading pays on condition. The four things every grader scores — centering, corners, edges and surface — can be checked at home before paying a fee, and a copy that is visibly off-centre or has a whitened corner will not gem whatever the population says. Those gem rates come from a self-selected population of clean copies, so a random copy does worse.

The cost column assumes a PSA submission at the tier covering the card's PSA 10 value, fees as of 2026-09-26, and raw is CardTrack's blended near-mint price, not a sale of your copy: pay more, or hold a lighter copy, and the break-even moves against you. Test a card with your own numbers in the ROI calculator, see the printings that fail the bar on the Venomoth card list, or see how gem-mint premiums run across the whole catalogue on the PSA premium index.

Venomoth grading questions

Which Venomoth card is the best to grade?
On current numbers the Venomoth (Skyridge #111): 51.7% of 120 graded copies came back PSA 10, an expected profit of $72 per submission after the $82 grading cost, against a best case of $149 if it gems.
How many Venomoth cards are worth grading?
1 keeps a positive expected value after the fee, out of the 7 with a gem-rate sample of at least ten graded copies. 7 cards on this page have a PSA 10 price that beats the raw price by more than the grading fee.
What gem rate do Venomoth cards get at PSA?
The median across the 7 sampled Venomoth cards is 27%, so about one in 4 of the copies collectors chose to submit came back PSA 10. The strongest rate with a sample of thirty or more is the Venomoth-GX (Unbroken Bonds #193) at 57.1% of 184.
Does the Venomoth ranking apply to CGC or Beckett?
Not directly. The cost column is PSA's fee as of 2026-09-26 and the graded columns are PSA slab prices; the gem-rate sample falls back to CGC's population only when PSA has fewer than ten copies. A CGC or Beckett submission has its own fee and resale price.