cardtrack

Best Diamond & Pearl Cards to Grade

The Diamond & Pearl cards worth grading, ranked by expected profit per submission — every grade outcome weighted by how often the card actually receives it — after current grading fees. The PSA 10 best case is shown on every row but does not decide the order. Top pick: Empoleon LV.X at an expected +$3,084.

Worth grading20
With a gem-rate sample20100%
Positive expected value9
Median gem rate3.8%
PSA fees as of2026-09-26

Ranked by expected profit 20

Diamond & Pearl cards worth grading, ranked by expected grading profit
#CardRawPSA 9PSA 10CostBest caseGem rateExpectedSample
1Empoleon LV.XEmpoleon LV.XDiamond & Pearl #120 · Classic (2004–2010)
Expected +$3,084 per submission: 3.2% of 616 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($30,600), and a PSA 9 ($12,240) still clears the $2,394 you have in it. Confidence high on that sample.
$69$12,240$30,600$2,325+$28,2063.2%+$3,084616
high
2LucarioLucarioDiamond & Pearl #6 · Classic (2004–2010)
Expected +$1,475 per submission: 2.7% of 262 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($38,000), and a PSA 9 ($3,500) still clears the $2,447 you have in it. Confidence high on that sample.
$48$3,500$38,000$2,399+$35,5532.7%+$1,475262
high
3Infernape LV.XInfernape LV.XDiamond & Pearl #121 · Classic (2004–2010)
Expected +$1,170 per submission: 7.2% of 877 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($16,800), and a PSA 9 ($985) still clears the $1,427 you have in it. Confidence high on that sample.
$240$985$16,800$1,187+$15,3737.2%+$1,170877
high
4Torterra LV.XTorterra LV.XDiamond & Pearl #122 · Classic (2004–2010)
Expected +$1,146 per submission: 6.7% of 872 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($14,700), and a PSA 9 ($1,950) still clears the $1,281 you have in it. Confidence high on that sample.
$115$1,950$14,700$1,166+$13,4196.7%+$1,146872
high
5PalkiaPalkiaDiamond & Pearl #11 · Classic (2004–2010)
Expected +$347 per submission: 2.9% of 310 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($7,500), and a PSA 9 ($630) still clears the $712 you have in it. Confidence high on that sample.
$18$630$7,500$694+$6,7882.9%+$347310
high
6GengarGengarDiamond & Pearl #27 · Classic (2004–2010)
Expected +$321 per submission: 2.2% of 181 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($7,499), and a PSA 9 ($795) still clears the $744 you have in it. Confidence high on that sample.
$50$795$7,499$694+$6,7552.2%+$321181
high
7TorterraTorterraDiamond & Pearl #17 · Classic (2004–2010)
Expected +$194 per submission: 2.8% of 285 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($5,760), and a PSA 9 ($599) still clears the $695 you have in it. Confidence high on that sample.
$18$599$5,760$677+$5,0662.8%+$194285
high
8SnorlaxSnorlaxDiamond & Pearl #37 · Classic (2004–2010)
Expected +$133 per submission: 5.6% of 36 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($2,350), and a PSA 9 ($186) still clears the $253 you have in it. Confidence medium on that sample.
$10$186$2,350$243+$2,0975.6%+$13336
medium
9ElectivireElectivireDiamond & Pearl #3 · Classic (2004–2010)
Expected +$32 per submission: 3.8% of 157 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($745), and a PSA 9 ($213) still clears the $93 you have in it. Confidence high on that sample.
$6$213$745$87+$6513.8%+$32157
high
10RhyperiorRhyperiorDiamond & Pearl #12 · Classic (2004–2010)
Expected loss −$4 per submission: 7.1% of 113 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($312), and a PSA 9 ($161) still clears the $92 you have in it. Confidence high on that sample.
$9$161$312$83+$2207.1%−$4113
high
11ManaphyManaphyDiamond & Pearl #9 · Classic (2004–2010)
Expected loss −$30 per submission: 2.7% of 149 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($403), and a PSA 9 ($100) still clears the $98 you have in it. Confidence high on that sample.
$14$100$403$84+$3052.7%−$30149
high
12BonslyBonslyDiamond & Pearl #71 · Classic (2004–2010)
Expected loss −$33 per submission: 16.7% of 42 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($192), and a PSA 9 ($121) still clears the $102 you have in it. Confidence medium on that sample.
$20$121$192$82+$9016.7%−$3342
medium
13AzurillAzurillDiamond & Pearl #69 · Classic (2004–2010)
Expected loss −$40 per submission: 16.1% of 62 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($159), and only a PSA 10 covers the $91 you have in it — a 9 loses money. Confidence medium on that sample.
$9$64$159$82+$6816.1%−$4062
medium
14HaunterHaunterDiamond & Pearl #50 · Classic (2004–2010)
Expected loss −$40 per submission: 28.6% of 35 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($125), and only a PSA 10 covers the $87 you have in it — a 9 loses money. Confidence medium on that sample.
$6$26$125$81+$3828.6%−$4035
medium
15DialgaDialgaDiamond & Pearl #1 · Classic (2004–2010)
Expected loss −$45 per submission: 2.3% of 309 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($485), and only a PSA 10 covers the $114 you have in it — a 9 loses money. Confidence high on that sample.
$29$80$485$85+$3712.3%−$45309
high
16ShiftryShiftryDiamond & Pearl #14 · Classic (2004–2010)
Expected loss −$46 per submission: 2.2% of 135 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($99), and only a PSA 10 covers the $89 you have in it — a 9 loses money. Confidence high on that sample.
$8$84$99$81+$102.2%−$46135
high
17MagnezoneMagnezoneDiamond & Pearl #8 · Classic (2004–2010)
Expected loss −$58 per submission: 4.1% of 145 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($99), and only a PSA 10 covers the $87 you have in it — a 9 loses money. Confidence high on that sample.
$6$40$99$81+$114.1%−$58145
high
18MantykeMantykeDiamond & Pearl #55 · Classic (2004–2010)
Expected loss −$61 per submission: 0% of 31 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($112), and only a PSA 10 covers the $86 you have in it — a 9 loses money. Confidence medium on that sample.
$5$66$112$81+$260%−$6131
medium
19MunchlaxMunchlaxDiamond & Pearl #33 · Classic (2004–2010)
Expected loss −$66 per submission: 5.6% of 18 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($107), and only a PSA 10 covers the $96 you have in it — a 9 loses money. Confidence low on that sample.
$15$43$107$81+$115.6%−$6618
low
20WynautWynautDiamond & Pearl #42 · Classic (2004–2010)
Expected loss −$77 per submission: 0% of 26 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($119), and only a PSA 10 covers the $87 you have in it — a 9 loses money. Confidence low on that sample.
$6$11$119$81+$320%−$7726
low

Expected = every grade outcome weighted by its share of the card's graded population, minus the raw price and the grading cost (PSA tier fee for the graded value plus ~$20 round-trip shipping, fees as of 2026-09-26). Best case is the PSA 10 leg alone. Gem rates come from a self-selected population — collectors grade their cleanest copies — so read them as an upper bound. Raw is a blended market price, not a sale of your copy. Full method and filters on the grading index.

How to read the Diamond & Pearl ranking

Every Diamond & Pearl card listed here clears one bar: its PSA 10 price beats its raw price by more than the cost of grading it. 20 cards from the set pass. 20 of them (100%) have a gem-rate sample of at least ten graded copies in the population reports, and 9 of those keep a positive expected value once every grade outcome is weighted by how often the card actually receives it.

The order is expected profit, not the PSA 10 best case, which rewards the widest raw-to-gem gap whether the card gems one time in two or one in fifty. Here the top row, the Empoleon LV.X from Diamond & Pearl, gems 3.2% of the time across 616 graded copies: +$3,084 is what a long run of submissions would average, $28,206 is what one lucky copy returns.

The median gem rate across the sampled Diamond & Pearl cards is 3.8%. Roughly one submitted copy in 26 came back PSA 10, and most rows here still cover raw price plus fee at PSA 9, so the PSA 9 price does most of the work. Of the 20 ranked cards, 12 still cover raw price plus fee at PSA 9, 8 need a 10 to break even and 11 lose money on expectation. 13 rest on a hundred or more graded copies.

Before you submit a Diamond & Pearl card

Grading pays on condition. The four things every grader scores — centering, corners, edges and surface — can be checked at home before paying a fee, and a copy that is visibly off-centre or has a whitened corner will not gem whatever the population says. Those gem rates come from a self-selected population of clean copies, so a random copy does worse.

The cost column assumes a PSA submission at the tier covering the card's PSA 10 value, fees as of 2026-09-26, and raw is CardTrack's blended near-mint price, not a sale of your copy: pay more, or hold a lighter copy, and the break-even moves against you. Test a card with your own numbers in the ROI calculator, see the printings that fail the bar on the Diamond & Pearl card list, or see how gem-mint premiums run across the whole catalogue on the PSA premium index.

Diamond & Pearl grading questions

Which Diamond & Pearl card is the best to grade?
On current numbers the Empoleon LV.X (Diamond & Pearl #120): 3.2% of 616 graded copies came back PSA 10, an expected profit of $3,084 per submission after the $2,325 grading cost, against a best case of $28,206 if it gems.
How many Diamond & Pearl cards are worth grading?
9 keep a positive expected value after the fee, out of the 20 with a gem-rate sample of at least ten graded copies. 20 cards on this page have a PSA 10 price that beats the raw price by more than the grading fee.
What gem rate do Diamond & Pearl cards get at PSA?
The median across the 20 sampled Diamond & Pearl cards is 3.8%, so about one in 26 of the copies collectors chose to submit came back PSA 10. The strongest rate with a sample of thirty or more is the Haunter (Diamond & Pearl #50) at 28.6% of 35.
Does the Diamond & Pearl ranking apply to CGC or Beckett?
Not directly. The cost column is PSA's fee as of 2026-09-26 and the graded columns are PSA slab prices; the gem-rate sample falls back to CGC's population only when PSA has fewer than ten copies. A CGC or Beckett submission has its own fee and resale price.