cardtrack

Best Dragon Cards to Grade

The Dragon cards worth grading, ranked by expected profit per submission — every grade outcome weighted by how often the card actually receives it — after current grading fees. The PSA 10 best case is shown on every row but does not decide the order. Top pick: Charizard at an expected +$2,926.

Worth grading32
With a gem-rate sample32100%
Positive expected value29
Median gem rate12.2%
PSA fees as of2026-09-26

Ranked by expected profit 32

Dragon cards worth grading, ranked by expected grading profit
#CardRawPSA 9PSA 10CostBest caseGem rateExpectedSample
1CharizardCharizardDragon #100 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected +$2,926 per submission: 5.6% of 2,934 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($40,800), and a PSA 9 ($5,200) still clears the $3,160 you have in it. Confidence high on that sample.
$733$5,200$40,800$2,427+$37,6405.6%+$2,9262,934
high
2Rayquaza exRayquaza exDragon #97 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected +$2,725 per submission: 4.3% of 3,032 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($60,000), and a PSA 9 ($7,900) still clears the $5,589 you have in it. Confidence high on that sample.
$1,970$7,900$60,000$3,619+$54,4114.3%+$2,7253,032
high
3Ampharos exAmpharos exDragon #89 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected +$2,408 per submission: 3.9% of 1,429 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($39,600), and a PSA 9 ($4,000) still clears the $2,675 you have in it. Confidence high on that sample.
$260$4,000$39,600$2,415+$36,9253.9%+$2,4081,429
high
4Latias exLatias exDragon #93 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected +$1,842 per submission: 4.1% of 2,126 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($32,660), and a PSA 9 ($3,099) still clears the $2,756 you have in it. Confidence high on that sample.
$410$3,099$32,660$2,346+$29,9044.1%+$1,8422,126
high
5Latios exLatios exDragon #94 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected +$1,515 per submission: 3.6% of 2,161 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($32,100), and a PSA 9 ($2,400) still clears the $2,739 you have in it. Confidence high on that sample.
$399$2,400$32,100$2,340+$29,3613.6%+$1,5152,161
high
6Dragonite exDragonite exDragon #90 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected +$1,322 per submission: 4.5% of 2,784 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($15,000), and a PSA 9 ($6,800) still clears the $2,469 you have in it. Confidence high on that sample.
$1,300$6,800$15,000$1,169+$12,5314.5%+$1,3222,784
high
7PluslePlusleDragon #8 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected +$1,086 per submission: 14.1% of 327 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($7,700), and a PSA 9 ($576) still clears the $796 you have in it. Confidence high on that sample.
$100$576$7,700$696+$6,90414.1%+$1,086327
high
8SalamenceSalamenceDragon #10 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected +$1,058 per submission: 14.2% of 577 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($8,500), and a PSA 9 ($505) still clears the $954 you have in it. Confidence high on that sample.
$250$505$8,500$704+$7,54614.2%+$1,058577
high
9FlygonFlygonDragon #4 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected +$897 per submission: 15.6% of 377 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($6,000), and a PSA 9 ($430) still clears the $744 you have in it. Confidence high on that sample.
$65$430$6,000$679+$5,25615.6%+$897377
high
10Kingdra exKingdra exDragon #92 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected +$879 per submission: 9.5% of 1,280 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($9,000), and a PSA 9 ($750) still clears the $873 you have in it. Confidence high on that sample.
$164$750$9,000$709+$8,1279.5%+$8791,280
high
11AbsolAbsolDragon #1 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected +$687 per submission: 9.7% of 518 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($7,500), and a PSA 9 ($395) still clears the $835 you have in it. Confidence high on that sample.
$141$395$7,500$694+$6,6669.7%+$687518
high
12CharmanderCharmanderDragon #98 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected +$678 per submission: 10.1% of 1,192 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($8,320), and a PSA 9 ($630) still clears the $1,063 you have in it. Confidence high on that sample.
$361$630$8,320$702+$7,25610.1%+$6781,192
high
13AltariaAltariaDragon #2 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected +$632 per submission: 11.5% of 356 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($6,100), and a PSA 9 ($202) still clears the $741 you have in it. Confidence high on that sample.
$61$202$6,100$680+$5,35911.5%+$632356
high
14MudkipMudkipDragon #65 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected +$513 per submission: 36.3% of 91 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($1,500), and a PSA 9 ($200) still clears the $123 you have in it. Confidence medium on that sample.
$8$200$1,500$115+$1,37736.3%+$51391
medium
15Magcargo exMagcargo exDragon #95 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected +$499 per submission: 12.2% of 1,009 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($4,320), and a PSA 9 ($400) still clears the $502 you have in it. Confidence high on that sample.
$90$400$4,320$412+$3,81812.2%+$4991,009
high
16MinunMinunDragon #7 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected +$393 per submission: 13.8% of 319 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($1,764), and a PSA 9 ($750) still clears the $343 you have in it. Confidence high on that sample.
$106$750$1,764$237+$1,42113.8%+$393319
high
17CharmeleonCharmeleonDragon #99 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected +$381 per submission: 8.7% of 1,243 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($3,836), and a PSA 9 ($627) still clears the $535 you have in it. Confidence high on that sample.
$128$627$3,836$407+$3,3008.7%+$3811,243
high
18TorkoalTorkoalDragon #12 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected +$337 per submission: 16.7% of 323 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($2,450), and a PSA 9 ($275) still clears the $344 you have in it. Confidence high on that sample.
$100$275$2,450$244+$2,10716.7%+$337323
high
19Muk exMuk exDragon #96 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected +$334 per submission: 10.1% of 1,009 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($3,119), and a PSA 9 ($538) still clears the $515 you have in it. Confidence high on that sample.
$115$538$3,119$400+$2,60410.1%+$3341,009
high
20GolemGolemDragon #5 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected +$316 per submission: 14.7% of 339 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($2,750), and a PSA 9 ($135) still clears the $444 you have in it. Confidence high on that sample.
$47$135$2,750$397+$2,30714.7%+$316339
high
21RoseliaRoseliaDragon #9 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected +$296 per submission: 8.7% of 629 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($3,863), and a PSA 9 ($200) still clears the $425 you have in it. Confidence high on that sample.
$17$200$3,863$408+$3,4398.7%+$296629
high
22Golem exGolem exDragon #91 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected +$286 per submission: 8% of 1,135 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($3,550), and a PSA 9 ($527) still clears the $506 you have in it. Confidence high on that sample.
$101$527$3,550$405+$3,0458%+$2861,135
high
23ShedinjaShedinjaDragon #11 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected +$277 per submission: 11.6% of 303 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($2,800), and a PSA 9 ($225) still clears the $437 you have in it. Confidence high on that sample.
$40$225$2,800$397+$2,36311.6%+$277303
high
24GrumpigGrumpigDragon #6 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected +$132 per submission: 17.1% of 210 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($1,000), and a PSA 9 ($100) still clears the $109 you have in it. Confidence high on that sample.
$19$100$1,000$90+$89117.1%+$132210
high
25CrawdauntCrawdauntDragon #3 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected +$130 per submission: 10.4% of 618 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($1,766), and a PSA 9 ($107) still clears the $248 you have in it. Confidence high on that sample.
$11$107$1,766$237+$1,51810.4%+$130618
high
26GyaradosGyaradosDragon #32 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected +$117 per submission: 26.6% of 188 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($610), and a PSA 9 ($136) still clears the $106 you have in it. Confidence high on that sample.
$20$136$610$86+$50426.6%+$117188
high
27ShuppetShuppetDragon #43 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected +$107 per submission: 27.3% of 22 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($294), and a PSA 9 ($245) still clears the $107 you have in it. Confidence low on that sample.
$24$245$294$83+$18727.3%+$10722
low
28WhiscashWhiscashDragon #48 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected +$55 per submission: 33.3% of 18 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($355), and only a PSA 10 covers the $92 you have in it — a 9 loses money. Confidence low on that sample.
$8$47$355$84+$26433.3%+$5518
low
29HoundoomHoundoomDragon #34 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected +$21 per submission: 31.1% of 61 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($204), and a PSA 9 ($119) still clears the $92 you have in it. Confidence medium on that sample.
$10$119$204$82+$11231.1%+$2161
medium
30MagikarpMagikarpDragon #60 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected loss −$21 per submission: 26.7% of 101 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($179), and only a PSA 10 covers the $87 you have in it — a 9 loses money. Confidence high on that sample.
$5$26$179$82+$9226.7%−$21101
high
31SalamenceSalamenceDragon #19 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected loss −$23 per submission: 27.4% of 598 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($430), and only a PSA 10 covers the $174 you have in it — a 9 loses money. Confidence high on that sample.
$90$46$430$84+$25627.4%−$23598
high
32DragonairDragonairDragon #14 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected loss −$23 per submission: 23.8% of 181 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($109), and a PSA 9 ($100) still clears the $93 you have in it. Confidence high on that sample.
$12$100$109$81+$1623.8%−$23181
high

Expected = every grade outcome weighted by its share of the card's graded population, minus the raw price and the grading cost (PSA tier fee for the graded value plus ~$20 round-trip shipping, fees as of 2026-09-26). Best case is the PSA 10 leg alone. Gem rates come from a self-selected population — collectors grade their cleanest copies — so read them as an upper bound. Raw is a blended market price, not a sale of your copy. Full method and filters on the grading index.

How to read the Dragon ranking

Every Dragon card listed here clears one bar: its PSA 10 price beats its raw price by more than the cost of grading it. 32 cards from the set pass. 32 of them (100%) have a gem-rate sample of at least ten graded copies in the population reports, and 29 of those keep a positive expected value once every grade outcome is weighted by how often the card actually receives it.

The order is expected profit, not the PSA 10 best case, which rewards the widest raw-to-gem gap whether the card gems one time in two or one in fifty. Here the top row, the Charizard from Dragon, gems 5.6% of the time across 2,934 graded copies: +$2,926 is what a long run of submissions would average, $37,640 is what one lucky copy returns.

The median gem rate across the sampled Dragon cards is 12.2%. Roughly one submitted copy in 8 came back PSA 10, and most rows here still cover raw price plus fee at PSA 9, so the PSA 9 price does most of the work. Of the 32 ranked cards, 29 still cover raw price plus fee at PSA 9, 3 need a 10 to break even and 3 lose money on expectation. 28 rest on a hundred or more graded copies.

Before you submit a Dragon card

Grading pays on condition. The four things every grader scores — centering, corners, edges and surface — can be checked at home before paying a fee, and a copy that is visibly off-centre or has a whitened corner will not gem whatever the population says. Those gem rates come from a self-selected population of clean copies, so a random copy does worse.

The cost column assumes a PSA submission at the tier covering the card's PSA 10 value, fees as of 2026-09-26, and raw is CardTrack's blended near-mint price, not a sale of your copy: pay more, or hold a lighter copy, and the break-even moves against you. Test a card with your own numbers in the ROI calculator, see the printings that fail the bar on the Dragon card list, or see how gem-mint premiums run across the whole catalogue on the PSA premium index.

Dragon grading questions

Which Dragon card is the best to grade?
On current numbers the Charizard (Dragon #100): 5.6% of 2,934 graded copies came back PSA 10, an expected profit of $2,926 per submission after the $2,427 grading cost, against a best case of $37,640 if it gems.
How many Dragon cards are worth grading?
29 keep a positive expected value after the fee, out of the 32 with a gem-rate sample of at least ten graded copies. 32 cards on this page have a PSA 10 price that beats the raw price by more than the grading fee.
What gem rate do Dragon cards get at PSA?
The median across the 32 sampled Dragon cards is 12.2%, so about one in 8 of the copies collectors chose to submit came back PSA 10. The strongest rate with a sample of thirty or more is the Mudkip (Dragon #65) at 36.3% of 91.
Does the Dragon ranking apply to CGC or Beckett?
Not directly. The cost column is PSA's fee as of 2026-09-26 and the graded columns are PSA slab prices; the gem-rate sample falls back to CGC's population only when PSA has fewer than ten copies. A CGC or Beckett submission has its own fee and resale price.