cardtrack

Best Fossil Cards to Grade

The Fossil cards worth grading, ranked by expected profit per submission — every grade outcome weighted by how often the card actually receives it — after current grading fees. The PSA 10 best case is shown on every row but does not decide the order. Top pick: Gengar at an expected +$62.

Worth grading29
With a gem-rate sample29100%
Positive expected value8
Median gem rate3.4%
PSA fees as of2026-09-26

Ranked by expected profit 29

Fossil cards worth grading, ranked by expected grading profit
#CardRawPSA 9PSA 10CostBest caseGem rateExpectedSample
1GengarGengarFossil #20 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected +$62 per submission: 6.3% of 3,135 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($1,096), and a PSA 9 ($200) still clears the $141 you have in it. Confidence high on that sample.
$30$200$1,096$111+$9566.3%+$623,135
high
2GengarGengarFossil #5 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected +$39 per submission: 0.4% of 14,335 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($3,720), and a PSA 9 ($1,100) still clears the $593 you have in it. Confidence high on that sample.
$187$1,100$3,720$406+$3,1270.4%+$3914,335
high
3AerodactylAerodactylFossil #1 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected +$31 per submission: 0.9% of 7,500 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($9,000), and a PSA 9 ($133) still clears the $743 you have in it. Confidence high on that sample.
$34$133$9,000$709+$8,2570.9%+$317,500
high
4ZapdosZapdosFossil #15 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected +$29 per submission: 2.4% of 4,928 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($1,950), and a PSA 9 ($211) still clears the $270 you have in it. Confidence high on that sample.
$31$211$1,950$239+$1,6812.4%+$294,928
high
5DragoniteDragoniteFossil #19 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected +$28 per submission: 6.3% of 3,804 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($1,050), and a PSA 9 ($149) still clears the $139 you have in it. Confidence high on that sample.
$29$149$1,050$110+$9116.3%+$283,804
high
6DragoniteDragoniteFossil #4 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected +$21 per submission: 0.4% of 17,128 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($6,500), and a PSA 9 ($800) still clears the $835 you have in it. Confidence high on that sample.
$151$800$6,500$684+$5,6650.4%+$2117,128
high
7DittoDittoFossil #3 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected +$5 per submission: 2.1% of 5,569 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($2,149), and a PSA 9 ($185) still clears the $280 you have in it. Confidence high on that sample.
$40$185$2,149$240+$1,8682.1%+$55,569
high
8MoltresMoltresFossil #27 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected +$1 per submission: 8.5% of 1,531 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($699), and only a PSA 10 covers the $98 you have in it — a 9 loses money. Confidence high on that sample.
$11$56$699$87+$6018.5%+$11,531
high
9RaichuRaichuFossil #14 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected loss −$2 per submission: 0.6% of 7,489 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($3,888), and a PSA 9 ($265) still clears the $443 you have in it. Confidence high on that sample.
$35$265$3,888$408+$3,4450.6%−$27,489
high
10HypnoHypnoFossil #8 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected loss −$13 per submission: 1.4% of 5,545 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($2,515), and a PSA 9 ($111) still clears the $421 you have in it. Confidence high on that sample.
$27$111$2,515$394+$2,0941.4%−$135,545
high
11ArticunoArticunoFossil #2 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected loss −$15 per submission: 0.7% of 9,915 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($5,500), and a PSA 9 ($265) still clears the $734 you have in it. Confidence high on that sample.
$60$265$5,500$674+$4,7660.7%−$159,915
high
12ZapdosZapdosFossil #30 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected loss −$16 per submission: 8.3% of 1,537 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($500), and only a PSA 10 covers the $95 you have in it — a 9 loses money. Confidence high on that sample.
$10$59$500$85+$4058.3%−$161,537
high
13MagnetonMagnetonFossil #11 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected loss −$17 per submission: 2.8% of 6,144 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($1,100), and only a PSA 10 covers the $131 you have in it — a 9 loses money. Confidence high on that sample.
$20$94$1,100$111+$9692.8%−$176,144
high
14DittoDittoFossil #18 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected loss −$17 per submission: 12.8% of 786 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($355), and only a PSA 10 covers the $97 you have in it — a 9 loses money. Confidence high on that sample.
$13$55$355$84+$25812.8%−$17786
high
15MagnetonMagnetonFossil #26 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected loss −$18 per submission: 15.2% of 659 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($300), and only a PSA 10 covers the $90 you have in it — a 9 loses money. Confidence high on that sample.
$7$50$300$83+$21015.2%−$18659
high
16RaichuRaichuFossil #29 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected loss −$19 per submission: 10.8% of 1,299 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($406), and only a PSA 10 covers the $92 you have in it — a 9 loses money. Confidence high on that sample.
$8$37$406$84+$31410.8%−$191,299
high
17LaprasLaprasFossil #10 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected loss −$20 per submission: 0.4% of 13,560 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($6,000), and a PSA 9 ($210) still clears the $702 you have in it. Confidence high on that sample.
$23$210$6,000$679+$5,2990.4%−$2013,560
high
18MoltresMoltresFossil #12 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected loss −$22 per submission: 1.1% of 8,873 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($3,198), and a PSA 9 ($250) still clears the $466 you have in it. Confidence high on that sample.
$65$250$3,198$401+$2,7321.1%−$228,873
high
19LaprasLaprasFossil #25 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected loss −$22 per submission: 9.5% of 887 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($500), and only a PSA 10 covers the $95 you have in it — a 9 loses money. Confidence high on that sample.
$10$35$500$85+$4059.5%−$22887
high
20KabutopsKabutopsFossil #9 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected loss −$25 per submission: 0.7% of 6,700 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($3,700), and a PSA 9 ($152) still clears the $441 you have in it. Confidence high on that sample.
$35$152$3,700$406+$3,2590.7%−$256,700
high
21HaunterHaunterFossil #6 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected loss −$25 per submission: 1.9% of 7,237 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($1,139), and a PSA 9 ($176) still clears the $156 you have in it. Confidence high on that sample.
$45$176$1,139$111+$9821.9%−$257,237
high
22HypnoHypnoFossil #23 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected loss −$28 per submission: 12.8% of 662 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($241), and only a PSA 10 covers the $89 you have in it — a 9 loses money. Confidence high on that sample.
$7$50$241$82+$15212.8%−$28662
high
23HaunterHaunterFossil #21 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected loss −$29 per submission: 9.8% of 837 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($327), and only a PSA 10 covers the $94 you have in it — a 9 loses money. Confidence high on that sample.
$11$42$327$83+$2339.8%−$29837
high
24HitmonleeHitmonleeFossil #7 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected loss −$30 per submission: 0.5% of 5,625 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($4,500), and a PSA 9 ($170) still clears the $454 you have in it. Confidence high on that sample.
$40$170$4,500$414+$4,0460.5%−$305,625
high
25HitmonleeHitmonleeFossil #22 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected loss −$34 per submission: 13.3% of 663 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($194), and only a PSA 10 covers the $88 you have in it — a 9 loses money. Confidence high on that sample.
$6$48$194$82+$10613.3%−$34663
high
26KabutopsKabutopsFossil #24 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected loss −$36 per submission: 11.7% of 736 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($235), and only a PSA 10 covers the $89 you have in it — a 9 loses money. Confidence high on that sample.
$7$43$235$82+$14611.7%−$36736
high
27MukMukFossil #13 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected loss −$37 per submission: 3.4% of 8,512 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($550), and only a PSA 10 covers the $97 you have in it — a 9 loses money. Confidence high on that sample.
$12$65$550$85+$4523.4%−$378,512
high
28AerodactylAerodactylFossil #16 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected loss −$38 per submission: 11% of 955 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($232), and only a PSA 10 covers the $90 you have in it — a 9 loses money. Confidence high on that sample.
$8$45$232$82+$14111%−$38955
high
29ArticunoArticunoFossil #17 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected loss −$42 per submission: 7.6% of 1,420 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($173), and only a PSA 10 covers the $93 you have in it — a 9 loses money. Confidence high on that sample.
$11$85$173$82+$817.6%−$421,420
high

Expected = every grade outcome weighted by its share of the card's graded population, minus the raw price and the grading cost (PSA tier fee for the graded value plus ~$20 round-trip shipping, fees as of 2026-09-26). Best case is the PSA 10 leg alone. Gem rates come from a self-selected population — collectors grade their cleanest copies — so read them as an upper bound. Raw is a blended market price, not a sale of your copy. Full method and filters on the grading index.

How to read the Fossil ranking

Every Fossil card listed here clears one bar: its PSA 10 price beats its raw price by more than the cost of grading it. 29 cards from the set pass. 29 of them (100%) have a gem-rate sample of at least ten graded copies in the population reports, and 8 of those keep a positive expected value once every grade outcome is weighted by how often the card actually receives it.

The order is expected profit, not the PSA 10 best case, which rewards the widest raw-to-gem gap whether the card gems one time in two or one in fifty. Here the top row, the Gengar from Fossil, gems 6.3% of the time across 3,135 graded copies: +$62 is what a long run of submissions would average, $956 is what one lucky copy returns.

The median gem rate across the sampled Fossil cards is 3.4%. Roughly one submitted copy in 29 came back PSA 10, and most rows here still cover raw price plus fee at PSA 9, so the PSA 9 price does most of the work. Of the 29 ranked cards, 15 still cover raw price plus fee at PSA 9, 14 need a 10 to break even and 21 lose money on expectation. 29 rest on a hundred or more graded copies.

Before you submit a Fossil card

Grading pays on condition. The four things every grader scores — centering, corners, edges and surface — can be checked at home before paying a fee, and a copy that is visibly off-centre or has a whitened corner will not gem whatever the population says. Those gem rates come from a self-selected population of clean copies, so a random copy does worse.

The cost column assumes a PSA submission at the tier covering the card's PSA 10 value, fees as of 2026-09-26, and raw is CardTrack's blended near-mint price, not a sale of your copy: pay more, or hold a lighter copy, and the break-even moves against you. Test a card with your own numbers in the ROI calculator, see the printings that fail the bar on the Fossil card list, or see how gem-mint premiums run across the whole catalogue on the PSA premium index.

Fossil grading questions

Which Fossil card is the best to grade?
On current numbers the Gengar (Fossil #20): 6.3% of 3,135 graded copies came back PSA 10, an expected profit of $62 per submission after the $111 grading cost, against a best case of $956 if it gems.
How many Fossil cards are worth grading?
8 keep a positive expected value after the fee, out of the 29 with a gem-rate sample of at least ten graded copies. 29 cards on this page have a PSA 10 price that beats the raw price by more than the grading fee.
What gem rate do Fossil cards get at PSA?
The median across the 29 sampled Fossil cards is 3.4%, so about one in 29 of the copies collectors chose to submit came back PSA 10. The strongest rate with a sample of thirty or more is the Magneton (Fossil #26) at 15.2% of 659.
Does the Fossil ranking apply to CGC or Beckett?
Not directly. The cost column is PSA's fee as of 2026-09-26 and the graded columns are PSA slab prices; the gem-rate sample falls back to CGC's population only when PSA has fewer than ten copies. A CGC or Beckett submission has its own fee and resale price.