cardtrack

Best Fossil Cards to Grade

The Fossil cards worth grading, ranked by expected profit per submission — every grade outcome weighted by how often the card actually receives it — after current grading fees. The PSA 10 best case is shown on every row but does not decide the order. Top pick: Gengar at an expected +$64.

Worth grading29
With a gem-rate sample29100%
Positive expected value8
Median gem rate3.5%
PSA fees as of2026-09-26

Ranked by expected profit 29

Fossil cards worth grading, ranked by expected grading profit
#CardRawPSA 9PSA 10CostBest caseGem rateExpectedSample
1GengarGengarFossil #20 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected +$64 per submission: 7% of 2,784 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($1,096), and a PSA 9 ($200) still clears the $148 you have in it. Confidence high on that sample.
$37$200$1,096$111+$9497%+$642,784
high
2AerodactylAerodactylFossil #1 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected +$35 per submission: 1% of 7,271 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($9,000), and a PSA 9 ($133) still clears the $740 you have in it. Confidence high on that sample.
$31$133$9,000$709+$8,2601%+$357,271
high
3ZapdosZapdosFossil #15 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected +$32 per submission: 2.5% of 4,924 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($1,950), and a PSA 9 ($211) still clears the $269 you have in it. Confidence high on that sample.
$30$211$1,950$239+$1,6822.5%+$324,924
high
4DragoniteDragoniteFossil #19 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected +$32 per submission: 6.6% of 3,564 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($1,050), and a PSA 9 ($150) still clears the $141 you have in it. Confidence high on that sample.
$31$150$1,050$110+$9096.6%+$323,564
high
5GengarGengarFossil #5 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected +$20 per submission: 0.4% of 13,372 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($3,720), and a PSA 9 ($1,100) still clears the $606 you have in it. Confidence high on that sample.
$200$1,100$3,720$406+$3,1140.4%+$2013,372
high
6DragoniteDragoniteFossil #4 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected +$16 per submission: 0.4% of 16,340 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($6,500), and a PSA 9 ($800) still clears the $839 you have in it. Confidence high on that sample.
$155$800$6,500$684+$5,6610.4%+$1616,340
high
7DittoDittoFossil #3 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected +$10 per submission: 2.1% of 5,410 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($2,274), and a PSA 9 ($185) still clears the $282 you have in it. Confidence high on that sample.
$40$185$2,274$242+$1,9932.1%+$105,410
high
8MoltresMoltresFossil #27 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected +$2 per submission: 8.7% of 1,488 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($699), and only a PSA 10 covers the $98 you have in it — a 9 loses money. Confidence high on that sample.
$11$56$699$87+$6018.7%+$21,488
high
9RaichuRaichuFossil #14 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected loss −$4 per submission: 0.7% of 7,267 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($3,888), and a PSA 9 ($265) still clears the $442 you have in it. Confidence high on that sample.
$34$265$3,888$408+$3,4460.7%−$47,267
high
10ZapdosZapdosFossil #30 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected loss −$15 per submission: 8.6% of 1,474 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($483), and only a PSA 10 covers the $94 you have in it — a 9 loses money. Confidence high on that sample.
$9$59$483$85+$3898.6%−$151,474
high
11ArticunoArticunoFossil #2 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected loss −$16 per submission: 0.7% of 9,581 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($5,500), and a PSA 9 ($255) still clears the $737 you have in it. Confidence high on that sample.
$63$255$5,500$674+$4,7630.7%−$169,581
high
12MoltresMoltresFossil #12 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected loss −$16 per submission: 1.1% of 8,593 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($3,198), and a PSA 9 ($243) still clears the $461 you have in it. Confidence high on that sample.
$60$243$3,198$401+$2,7371.1%−$168,593
high
13HypnoHypnoFossil #8 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected loss −$16 per submission: 1.4% of 5,418 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($2,515), and only a PSA 10 covers the $421 you have in it — a 9 loses money. Confidence high on that sample.
$27$102$2,515$394+$2,0941.4%−$165,418
high
14DittoDittoFossil #18 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected loss −$16 per submission: 13.3% of 752 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($355), and only a PSA 10 covers the $97 you have in it — a 9 loses money. Confidence high on that sample.
$13$51$355$84+$25813.3%−$16752
high
15MagnetonMagnetonFossil #26 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected loss −$16 per submission: 15.6% of 643 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($300), and only a PSA 10 covers the $90 you have in it — a 9 loses money. Confidence high on that sample.
$7$50$300$83+$21015.6%−$16643
high
16MagnetonMagnetonFossil #11 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected loss −$17 per submission: 2.8% of 6,004 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($1,100), and only a PSA 10 covers the $131 you have in it — a 9 loses money. Confidence high on that sample.
$20$93$1,100$111+$9692.8%−$176,004
high
17RaichuRaichuFossil #29 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected loss −$18 per submission: 11.1% of 1,266 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($406), and only a PSA 10 covers the $92 you have in it — a 9 loses money. Confidence high on that sample.
$8$37$406$84+$31411.1%−$181,266
high
18HaunterHaunterFossil #6 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected loss −$20 per submission: 1.9% of 6,991 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($1,139), and a PSA 9 ($144) still clears the $148 you have in it. Confidence high on that sample.
$37$144$1,139$111+$9911.9%−$206,991
high
19LaprasLaprasFossil #25 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected loss −$20 per submission: 9.7% of 867 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($500), and only a PSA 10 covers the $94 you have in it — a 9 loses money. Confidence high on that sample.
$9$35$500$85+$4069.7%−$20867
high
20LaprasLaprasFossil #10 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected loss −$21 per submission: 0.4% of 13,130 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($6,000), and a PSA 9 ($210) still clears the $703 you have in it. Confidence high on that sample.
$24$210$6,000$679+$5,2970.4%−$2113,130
high
21HaunterHaunterFossil #21 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected loss −$26 per submission: 10.3% of 793 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($327), and only a PSA 10 covers the $94 you have in it — a 9 loses money. Confidence high on that sample.
$11$42$327$83+$23310.3%−$26793
high
22HypnoHypnoFossil #23 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected loss −$26 per submission: 13.1% of 648 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($241), and only a PSA 10 covers the $88 you have in it — a 9 loses money. Confidence high on that sample.
$6$50$241$82+$15313.1%−$26648
high
23KabutopsKabutopsFossil #9 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected loss −$33 per submission: 0.7% of 6,505 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($3,700), and a PSA 9 ($140) still clears the $445 you have in it. Confidence high on that sample.
$39$140$3,700$406+$3,2550.7%−$336,505
high
24HitmonleeHitmonleeFossil #22 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected loss −$33 per submission: 13.7% of 642 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($194), and only a PSA 10 covers the $88 you have in it — a 9 loses money. Confidence high on that sample.
$6$48$194$82+$10613.7%−$33642
high
25HitmonleeHitmonleeFossil #7 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected loss −$34 per submission: 0.5% of 5,485 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($4,500), and a PSA 9 ($170) still clears the $454 you have in it. Confidence high on that sample.
$40$170$4,500$414+$4,0460.5%−$345,485
high
26KabutopsKabutopsFossil #24 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected loss −$34 per submission: 12% of 715 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($254), and only a PSA 10 covers the $90 you have in it — a 9 loses money. Confidence high on that sample.
$7$43$254$83+$16412%−$34715
high
27AerodactylAerodactylFossil #16 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected loss −$37 per submission: 11.4% of 919 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($232), and only a PSA 10 covers the $90 you have in it — a 9 loses money. Confidence high on that sample.
$8$45$232$82+$14111.4%−$37919
high
28MukMukFossil #13 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected loss −$39 per submission: 3.5% of 8,320 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($550), and only a PSA 10 covers the $97 you have in it — a 9 loses money. Confidence high on that sample.
$12$60$550$85+$4533.5%−$398,320
high
29ArticunoArticunoFossil #17 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected loss −$41 per submission: 7.8% of 1,386 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($173), and only a PSA 10 covers the $92 you have in it — a 9 loses money. Confidence high on that sample.
$10$85$173$82+$817.8%−$411,386
high

Expected = every grade outcome weighted by its share of the card's graded population, minus the raw price and the grading cost (PSA tier fee for the graded value plus ~$20 round-trip shipping, fees as of 2026-09-26). Best case is the PSA 10 leg alone. Gem rates come from a self-selected population — collectors grade their cleanest copies — so read them as an upper bound. Raw is a blended market price, not a sale of your copy. Full method and filters on the grading index.

How to read the Fossil ranking

Every Fossil card listed here clears one bar: its PSA 10 price beats its raw price by more than the cost of grading it. 29 cards from the set pass. 29 of them (100%) have a gem-rate sample of at least ten graded copies in the population reports, and 8 of those keep a positive expected value once every grade outcome is weighted by how often the card actually receives it.

The order is expected profit, not the PSA 10 best case, which rewards the widest raw-to-gem gap whether the card gems one time in two or one in fifty. Here the top row, the Gengar from Fossil, gems 7% of the time across 2,784 graded copies: +$64 is what a long run of submissions would average, $949 is what one lucky copy returns.

The median gem rate across the sampled Fossil cards is 3.5%. Roughly one submitted copy in 29 came back PSA 10, and most rows here need that PSA 10 to cover raw price plus fee, so the gem rate decides whether a submission pays. Of the 29 ranked cards, 14 still cover raw price plus fee at PSA 9, 15 need a 10 to break even and 21 lose money on expectation. 29 rest on a hundred or more graded copies.

Before you submit a Fossil card

Grading pays on condition. The four things every grader scores — centering, corners, edges and surface — can be checked at home before paying a fee, and a copy that is visibly off-centre or has a whitened corner will not gem whatever the population says. Those gem rates come from a self-selected population of clean copies, so a random copy does worse.

The cost column assumes a PSA submission at the tier covering the card's PSA 10 value, fees as of 2026-09-26, and raw is CardTrack's blended near-mint price, not a sale of your copy: pay more, or hold a lighter copy, and the break-even moves against you. Test a card with your own numbers in the ROI calculator, see the printings that fail the bar on the Fossil card list, or see how gem-mint premiums run across the whole catalogue on the PSA premium index.

Fossil grading questions

Which Fossil card is the best to grade?
On current numbers the Gengar (Fossil #20): 7% of 2,784 graded copies came back PSA 10, an expected profit of $64 per submission after the $111 grading cost, against a best case of $949 if it gems.
How many Fossil cards are worth grading?
8 keep a positive expected value after the fee, out of the 29 with a gem-rate sample of at least ten graded copies. 29 cards on this page have a PSA 10 price that beats the raw price by more than the grading fee.
What gem rate do Fossil cards get at PSA?
The median across the 29 sampled Fossil cards is 3.5%, so about one in 29 of the copies collectors chose to submit came back PSA 10. The strongest rate with a sample of thirty or more is the Magneton (Fossil #26) at 15.6% of 643.
Does the Fossil ranking apply to CGC or Beckett?
Not directly. The cost column is PSA's fee as of 2026-09-26 and the graded columns are PSA slab prices; the gem-rate sample falls back to CGC's population only when PSA has fewer than ten copies. A CGC or Beckett submission has its own fee and resale price.