cardtrack

Best Jungle Cards to Grade

The Jungle cards worth grading, ranked by expected profit per submission — every grade outcome weighted by how often the card actually receives it — after current grading fees. The PSA 10 best case is shown on every row but does not decide the order. Top pick: Snorlax at an expected +$102.

Worth grading30
With a gem-rate sample30100%
Positive expected value4
Median gem rate1.7%
PSA fees as of2026-09-26

Ranked by expected profit 30

Jungle cards worth grading, ranked by expected grading profit
#CardRawPSA 9PSA 10CostBest caseGem rateExpectedSample
1SnorlaxSnorlaxJungle #11 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected +$102 per submission: 0.4% of 9,334 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($19,800), and a PSA 9 ($750) still clears the $1,336 you have in it. Confidence high on that sample.
$119$750$19,800$1,217+$18,4640.4%+$1029,334
high
2FlareonFlareonJungle #3 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected +$33 per submission: 1.3% of 8,984 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($5,000), and a PSA 9 ($270) still clears the $489 you have in it. Confidence high on that sample.
$70$270$5,000$419+$4,5111.3%+$338,984
high
3SnorlaxSnorlaxJungle #27 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected +$32 per submission: 8.4% of 1,803 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($810), and a PSA 9 ($135) still clears the $105 you have in it. Confidence high on that sample.
$17$135$810$88+$7058.4%+$321,803
high
4VaporeonVaporeonJungle #28 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected +$3 per submission: 11.9% of 1,106 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($282), and a PSA 9 ($140) still clears the $98 you have in it. Confidence high on that sample.
$15$140$282$83+$18411.9%+$31,106
high
5PidgeotPidgeotJungle #8 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected loss −$2 per submission: 0.9% of 5,213 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($4,000), and a PSA 9 ($201) still clears the $451 you have in it. Confidence high on that sample.
$42$201$4,000$409+$3,5490.9%−$25,213
high
6JolteonJolteonJungle #20 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected loss −$2 per submission: 10.8% of 1,280 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($570), and only a PSA 10 covers the $101 you have in it — a 9 loses money. Confidence high on that sample.
$15$52$570$86+$46910.8%−$21,280
high
7JolteonJolteonJungle #4 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected loss −$10 per submission: 0.9% of 8,539 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($2,880), and a PSA 9 ($290) still clears the $478 you have in it. Confidence high on that sample.
$80$290$2,880$398+$2,4020.9%−$108,539
high
8ScytherScytherJungle #10 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected loss −$10 per submission: 1.5% of 6,120 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($2,849), and a PSA 9 ($160) still clears the $447 you have in it. Confidence high on that sample.
$50$160$2,849$397+$2,4011.5%−$106,120
high
9VaporeonVaporeonJungle #12 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected loss −$20 per submission: 0.2% of 16,002 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($10,500), and a PSA 9 ($395) still clears the $1,163 you have in it. Confidence high on that sample.
$39$395$10,500$1,124+$9,3370.2%−$2016,002
high
10WigglytuffWigglytuffJungle #16 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected loss −$20 per submission: 0.9% of 4,075 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($3,000), and a PSA 9 ($200) still clears the $429 you have in it. Confidence high on that sample.
$30$200$3,000$399+$2,5710.9%−$204,075
high
11ClefableClefableJungle #1 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected loss −$23 per submission: 0.7% of 5,201 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($5,000), and a PSA 9 ($150) still clears the $452 you have in it. Confidence high on that sample.
$33$150$5,000$419+$4,5480.7%−$235,201
high
12NidoqueenNidoqueenJungle #7 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected loss −$25 per submission: 1.1% of 5,180 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($1,020), and a PSA 9 ($167) still clears the $136 you have in it. Confidence high on that sample.
$26$167$1,020$110+$8841.1%−$255,180
high
13Mr. MimeMr. MimeJungle #22 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected loss −$25 per submission: 15.7% of 517 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($225), and only a PSA 10 covers the $91 you have in it — a 9 loses money. Confidence high on that sample.
$9$53$225$82+$13415.7%−$25517
high
14Mr. MimeMr. MimeJungle #6 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected loss −$26 per submission: 1.2% of 4,852 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($1,050), and a PSA 9 ($192) still clears the $140 you have in it. Confidence high on that sample.
$30$192$1,050$110+$9101.2%−$264,852
high
15ClefableClefableJungle #17 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected loss −$26 per submission: 12.4% of 605 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($300), and only a PSA 10 covers the $92 you have in it — a 9 loses money. Confidence high on that sample.
$9$45$300$83+$20812.4%−$26605
high
16PinsirPinsirJungle #25 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected loss −$27 per submission: 14.7% of 490 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($250), and only a PSA 10 covers the $89 you have in it — a 9 loses money. Confidence high on that sample.
$7$47$250$82+$16114.7%−$27490
high
17FlareonFlareonJungle #19 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected loss −$28 per submission: 10.7% of 1,498 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($360), and only a PSA 10 covers the $100 you have in it — a 9 loses money. Confidence high on that sample.
$16$52$360$84+$26010.7%−$281,498
high
18ScytherScytherJungle #26 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected loss −$31 per submission: 10.6% of 734 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($224), and only a PSA 10 covers the $95 you have in it — a 9 loses money. Confidence high on that sample.
$13$86$224$82+$12910.6%−$31734
high
19VileplumeVileplumeJungle #15 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected loss −$32 per submission: 1% of 4,342 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($1,200), and a PSA 9 ($190) still clears the $142 you have in it. Confidence high on that sample.
$30$190$1,200$112+$1,0591%−$324,342
high
20ElectrodeElectrodeJungle #2 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected loss −$33 per submission: 1.7% of 4,651 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($990), and a PSA 9 ($139) still clears the $120 you have in it. Confidence high on that sample.
$30$139$990$90+$8701.7%−$334,651
high
21KangaskhanKangaskhanJungle #21 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected loss −$35 per submission: 12.3% of 584 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($250), and only a PSA 10 covers the $88 you have in it — a 9 loses money. Confidence high on that sample.
$6$35$250$82+$16212.3%−$35584
high
22PidgeotPidgeotJungle #24 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected loss −$36 per submission: 15.2% of 572 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($200), and only a PSA 10 covers the $90 you have in it — a 9 loses money. Confidence high on that sample.
$8$45$200$82+$11015.2%−$36572
high
23KangaskhanKangaskhanJungle #5 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected loss −$37 per submission: 0.3% of 10,151 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($4,254), and a PSA 9 ($147) still clears the $426 you have in it. Confidence high on that sample.
$14$147$4,254$412+$3,8290.3%−$3710,151
high
24VictreebelVictreebelJungle #30 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected loss −$37 per submission: 15.3% of 451 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($180), and only a PSA 10 covers the $89 you have in it — a 9 loses money. Confidence high on that sample.
$7$45$180$82+$9115.3%−$37451
high
25VenomothVenomothJungle #13 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected loss −$41 per submission: 0.9% of 4,398 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($2,000), and a PSA 9 ($110) still clears the $267 you have in it. Confidence high on that sample.
$28$110$2,000$239+$1,7330.9%−$414,398
high
26NidoqueenNidoqueenJungle #23 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected loss −$42 per submission: 14.1% of 540 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($163), and only a PSA 10 covers the $91 you have in it — a 9 loses money. Confidence high on that sample.
$9$39$163$82+$7214.1%−$42540
high
27VictreebelVictreebelJungle #14 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected loss −$45 per submission: 1% of 3,938 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($1,050), and a PSA 9 ($130) still clears the $138 you have in it. Confidence high on that sample.
$28$130$1,050$110+$9121%−$453,938
high
28PinsirPinsirJungle #9 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected loss −$49 per submission: 1% of 4,588 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($1,051), and a PSA 9 ($119) still clears the $146 you have in it. Confidence high on that sample.
$35$119$1,051$111+$9051%−$494,588
high
29VileplumeVileplumeJungle #31 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected loss −$58 per submission: 13.9% of 488 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($135), and only a PSA 10 covers the $89 you have in it — a 9 loses money. Confidence high on that sample.
$8$17$135$81+$4513.9%−$58488
high
30MeowthMeowthJungle #56 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected loss −$70 per submission: 13.1% of 3,868 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($198), and only a PSA 10 covers the $134 you have in it — a 9 loses money. Confidence high on that sample.
$52$49$198$82+$6413.1%−$703,868
high

Expected = every grade outcome weighted by its share of the card's graded population, minus the raw price and the grading cost (PSA tier fee for the graded value plus ~$20 round-trip shipping, fees as of 2026-09-26). Best case is the PSA 10 leg alone. Gem rates come from a self-selected population — collectors grade their cleanest copies — so read them as an upper bound. Raw is a blended market price, not a sale of your copy. Full method and filters on the grading index.

How to read the Jungle ranking

Every Jungle card listed here clears one bar: its PSA 10 price beats its raw price by more than the cost of grading it. 30 cards from the set pass. 30 of them (100%) have a gem-rate sample of at least ten graded copies in the population reports, and 4 of those keep a positive expected value once every grade outcome is weighted by how often the card actually receives it.

The order is expected profit, not the PSA 10 best case, which rewards the widest raw-to-gem gap whether the card gems one time in two or one in fifty. Here the top row, the Snorlax from Jungle, gems 0.4% of the time across 9,334 graded copies: +$102 is what a long run of submissions would average, $18,464 is what one lucky copy returns.

The median gem rate across the sampled Jungle cards is 1.7%. Roughly one submitted copy in 59 came back PSA 10, and most rows here still cover raw price plus fee at PSA 9, so the PSA 9 price does most of the work. Of the 30 ranked cards, 18 still cover raw price plus fee at PSA 9, 12 need a 10 to break even and 26 lose money on expectation. 30 rest on a hundred or more graded copies.

Before you submit a Jungle card

Grading pays on condition. The four things every grader scores — centering, corners, edges and surface — can be checked at home before paying a fee, and a copy that is visibly off-centre or has a whitened corner will not gem whatever the population says. Those gem rates come from a self-selected population of clean copies, so a random copy does worse.

The cost column assumes a PSA submission at the tier covering the card's PSA 10 value, fees as of 2026-09-26, and raw is CardTrack's blended near-mint price, not a sale of your copy: pay more, or hold a lighter copy, and the break-even moves against you. Test a card with your own numbers in the ROI calculator, see the printings that fail the bar on the Jungle card list, or see how gem-mint premiums run across the whole catalogue on the PSA premium index.

Jungle grading questions

Which Jungle card is the best to grade?
On current numbers the Snorlax (Jungle #11): 0.4% of 9,334 graded copies came back PSA 10, an expected profit of $102 per submission after the $1,217 grading cost, against a best case of $18,464 if it gems.
How many Jungle cards are worth grading?
4 keep a positive expected value after the fee, out of the 30 with a gem-rate sample of at least ten graded copies. 30 cards on this page have a PSA 10 price that beats the raw price by more than the grading fee.
What gem rate do Jungle cards get at PSA?
The median across the 30 sampled Jungle cards is 1.7%, so about one in 59 of the copies collectors chose to submit came back PSA 10. The strongest rate with a sample of thirty or more is the Mr. Mime (Jungle #22) at 15.7% of 517.
Does the Jungle ranking apply to CGC or Beckett?
Not directly. The cost column is PSA's fee as of 2026-09-26 and the graded columns are PSA slab prices; the gem-rate sample falls back to CGC's population only when PSA has fewer than ten copies. A CGC or Beckett submission has its own fee and resale price.