cardtrack

Best Neo Discovery Cards to Grade

The Neo Discovery cards worth grading, ranked by expected profit per submission — every grade outcome weighted by how often the card actually receives it — after current grading fees. The PSA 10 best case is shown on every row but does not decide the order. Top pick: Umbreon at an expected +$444.

Worth grading32
With a gem-rate sample32100%
Positive expected value15
Median gem rate8.6%
PSA fees as of2026-09-26

Ranked by expected profit 32

Neo Discovery cards worth grading, ranked by expected grading profit
#CardRawPSA 9PSA 10CostBest caseGem rateExpectedSample
1UmbreonUmbreonNeo Discovery #13 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected +$444 per submission: 1.6% of 6,927 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($28,200), and a PSA 9 ($2,113) still clears the $3,051 you have in it. Confidence high on that sample.
$750$2,113$28,200$2,301+$25,1491.6%+$4446,927
high
2EspeonEspeonNeo Discovery #1 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected +$187 per submission: 2.1% of 4,767 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($12,000), and a PSA 9 ($660) still clears the $1,439 you have in it. Confidence high on that sample.
$300$660$12,000$1,139+$10,5612.1%+$1874,767
high
3TyranitarTyranitarNeo Discovery #31 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected +$113 per submission: 9.8% of 594 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($1,750), and only a PSA 10 covers the $258 you have in it — a 9 loses money. Confidence high on that sample.
$21$95$1,750$237+$1,4929.8%+$113594
high
4UmbreonUmbreonNeo Discovery #32 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected +$102 per submission: 8.6% of 1,446 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($1,710), and a PSA 9 ($282) still clears the $336 you have in it. Confidence high on that sample.
$100$282$1,710$236+$1,3748.6%+$1021,446
high
5TyranitarTyranitarNeo Discovery #12 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected +$97 per submission: 2.6% of 3,213 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($3,802), and a PSA 9 ($492) still clears the $557 you have in it. Confidence high on that sample.
$150$492$3,802$407+$3,2452.6%+$973,213
high
6YanmaYanmaNeo Discovery #17 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected +$81 per submission: 1.2% of 1,037 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($12,000), and a PSA 9 ($165) still clears the $1,173 you have in it. Confidence high on that sample.
$34$165$12,000$1,139+$10,8271.2%+$811,037
high
7KabutopsKabutopsNeo Discovery #6 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected +$81 per submission: 1.7% of 1,628 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($4,448), and a PSA 9 ($397) still clears the $493 you have in it. Confidence high on that sample.
$80$397$4,448$413+$3,9551.7%+$811,628
high
8WobbuffetWobbuffetNeo Discovery #35 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected +$40 per submission: 24.3% of 70 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($444), and only a PSA 10 covers the $91 you have in it — a 9 loses money. Confidence medium on that sample.
$7$35$444$84+$35324.3%+$4070
medium
9UrsaringUrsaringNeo Discovery #15 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected +$36 per submission: 4.7% of 985 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($2,100), and only a PSA 10 covers the $286 you have in it — a 9 loses money. Confidence high on that sample.
$46$120$2,100$240+$1,8144.7%+$36985
high
10EspeonEspeonNeo Discovery #20 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected +$26 per submission: 11.1% of 849 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($667), and a PSA 9 ($125) still clears the $110 you have in it. Confidence high on that sample.
$23$125$667$87+$55711.1%+$26849
high
11MagnemiteMagnemiteNeo Discovery #7 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected +$21 per submission: 9.5% of 786 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($680), and a PSA 9 ($126) still clears the $121 you have in it. Confidence high on that sample.
$34$126$680$87+$5599.5%+$21786
high
12HoundoomHoundoomNeo Discovery #4 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected +$14 per submission: 0.8% of 2,121 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($4,850), and a PSA 9 ($300) still clears the $509 you have in it. Confidence high on that sample.
$91$300$4,850$418+$4,3420.8%+$142,121
high
13ForretressForretressNeo Discovery #2 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected +$13 per submission: 7.8% of 785 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($900), and only a PSA 10 covers the $116 you have in it — a 9 loses money. Confidence high on that sample.
$27$78$900$89+$7847.8%+$13785
high
14PoliwrathPoliwrathNeo Discovery #28 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected +$4 per submission: 22.6% of 84 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($300), and only a PSA 10 covers the $91 you have in it — a 9 loses money. Confidence medium on that sample.
$8$40$300$83+$20922.6%+$484
medium
15PolitoedPolitoedNeo Discovery #8 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected +$3 per submission: 1.5% of 1,296 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($1,700), and a PSA 9 ($323) still clears the $326 you have in it. Confidence high on that sample.
$90$323$1,700$236+$1,3741.5%+$31,296
high
16WobbuffetWobbuffetNeo Discovery #16 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected +$0 per submission: 0.9% of 1,128 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($6,600), and a PSA 9 ($165) still clears the $730 you have in it. Confidence high on that sample.
$45$165$6,600$685+$5,8700.9%+$01,128
high
17HoundourHoundourNeo Discovery #5 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected +$-0 per submission: 0.6% of 1,611 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($2,313), and a PSA 9 ($361) still clears the $332 you have in it. Confidence high on that sample.
$90$361$2,313$242+$1,9810.6%+$01,611
high
18ScizorScizorNeo Discovery #29 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected +$-0 per submission: 15.1% of 192 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($412), and only a PSA 10 covers the $95 you have in it — a 9 loses money. Confidence high on that sample.
$11$47$412$84+$31715.1%+$0192
high
19ScizorScizorNeo Discovery #10 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected loss −$3 per submission: 1.2% of 1,627 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($2,026), and a PSA 9 ($377) still clears the $320 you have in it. Confidence high on that sample.
$81$377$2,026$239+$1,7061.2%−$31,627
high
20HoundoomHoundoomNeo Discovery #23 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected loss −$3 per submission: 14.6% of 213 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($432), and only a PSA 10 covers the $100 you have in it — a 9 loses money. Confidence high on that sample.
$16$50$432$84+$33214.6%−$3213
high
21SmeargleSmeargleNeo Discovery #11 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected loss −$4 per submission: 0.4% of 1,004 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($1,182), and a PSA 9 ($360) still clears the $167 you have in it. Confidence high on that sample.
$55$360$1,182$112+$1,0150.4%−$41,004
high
22Unown [A]Unown [A]Neo Discovery #14 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected loss −$10 per submission: 3.3% of 1,467 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($1,000), and only a PSA 10 covers the $108 you have in it — a 9 loses money. Confidence high on that sample.
$18$95$1,000$90+$8923.3%−$101,467
high
23EeveeEeveeNeo Discovery #38 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected loss −$17 per submission: 18.8% of 319 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($213), and only a PSA 10 covers the $87 you have in it — a 9 loses money. Confidence high on that sample.
$5$53$213$82+$12618.8%−$17319
high
24HoundourHoundourNeo Discovery #24 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected loss −$18 per submission: 19.2% of 99 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($222), and only a PSA 10 covers the $96 you have in it — a 9 loses money. Confidence medium on that sample.
$14$66$222$82+$12519.2%−$1899
medium
25PoliwrathPoliwrathNeo Discovery #9 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected loss −$24 per submission: 2.2% of 1,205 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($1,010), and a PSA 9 ($148) still clears the $159 you have in it. Confidence high on that sample.
$49$148$1,010$110+$8512.2%−$241,205
high
26SmeargleSmeargleNeo Discovery #30 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected loss −$29 per submission: 15.5% of 84 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($255), and only a PSA 10 covers the $93 you have in it — a 9 loses money. Confidence medium on that sample.
$10$40$255$83+$16215.5%−$2984
medium
27ForretressForretressNeo Discovery #21 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected loss −$29 per submission: 25.9% of 81 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($166), and only a PSA 10 covers the $90 you have in it — a 9 loses money. Confidence medium on that sample.
$8$41$166$82+$7625.9%−$2981
medium
28KabutopsKabutopsNeo Discovery #25 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected loss −$33 per submission: 20.6% of 194 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($203), and only a PSA 10 covers the $95 you have in it — a 9 loses money. Confidence high on that sample.
$13$28$203$82+$10820.6%−$33194
high
29UrsaringUrsaringNeo Discovery #34 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected loss −$38 per submission: 18.8% of 85 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($126), and only a PSA 10 covers the $87 you have in it — a 9 loses money. Confidence medium on that sample.
$6$37$126$81+$3918.8%−$3885
medium
30HitmontopHitmontopNeo Discovery #3 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected loss −$39 per submission: 1.3% of 1,571 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($331), and a PSA 9 ($120) still clears the $100 you have in it. Confidence high on that sample.
$17$120$331$83+$2301.3%−$391,571
high
31MagnemiteMagnemiteNeo Discovery #26 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected loss −$42 per submission: 14.4% of 97 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($175), and only a PSA 10 covers the $88 you have in it — a 9 loses money. Confidence medium on that sample.
$6$28$175$82+$8714.4%−$4297
medium
32HitmontopHitmontopNeo Discovery #22 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected loss −$48 per submission: 16.7% of 84 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($90), and only a PSA 10 covers the $87 you have in it — a 9 loses money. Confidence medium on that sample.
$6$35$90$81+$316.7%−$4884
medium

Expected = every grade outcome weighted by its share of the card's graded population, minus the raw price and the grading cost (PSA tier fee for the graded value plus ~$20 round-trip shipping, fees as of 2026-09-26). Best case is the PSA 10 leg alone. Gem rates come from a self-selected population — collectors grade their cleanest copies — so read them as an upper bound. Raw is a blended market price, not a sale of your copy. Full method and filters on the grading index.

How to read the Neo Discovery ranking

Every Neo Discovery card listed here clears one bar: its PSA 10 price beats its raw price by more than the cost of grading it. 32 cards from the set pass. 32 of them (100%) have a gem-rate sample of at least ten graded copies in the population reports, and 15 of those keep a positive expected value once every grade outcome is weighted by how often the card actually receives it.

The order is expected profit, not the PSA 10 best case, which rewards the widest raw-to-gem gap whether the card gems one time in two or one in fifty. Here the top row, the Umbreon from Neo Discovery, gems 1.6% of the time across 6,927 graded copies: +$444 is what a long run of submissions would average, $25,149 is what one lucky copy returns.

The median gem rate across the sampled Neo Discovery cards is 8.6%. Roughly one submitted copy in 12 came back PSA 10, and most rows here still cover raw price plus fee at PSA 9, so the PSA 9 price does most of the work. Of the 32 ranked cards, 16 still cover raw price plus fee at PSA 9, 16 need a 10 to break even and 14 lose money on expectation. 24 rest on a hundred or more graded copies.

Before you submit a Neo Discovery card

Grading pays on condition. The four things every grader scores — centering, corners, edges and surface — can be checked at home before paying a fee, and a copy that is visibly off-centre or has a whitened corner will not gem whatever the population says. Those gem rates come from a self-selected population of clean copies, so a random copy does worse.

The cost column assumes a PSA submission at the tier covering the card's PSA 10 value, fees as of 2026-09-26, and raw is CardTrack's blended near-mint price, not a sale of your copy: pay more, or hold a lighter copy, and the break-even moves against you. Test a card with your own numbers in the ROI calculator, see the printings that fail the bar on the Neo Discovery card list, or see how gem-mint premiums run across the whole catalogue on the PSA premium index.

Neo Discovery grading questions

Which Neo Discovery card is the best to grade?
On current numbers the Umbreon (Neo Discovery #13): 1.6% of 6,927 graded copies came back PSA 10, an expected profit of $444 per submission after the $2,301 grading cost, against a best case of $25,149 if it gems.
How many Neo Discovery cards are worth grading?
15 keep a positive expected value after the fee, out of the 32 with a gem-rate sample of at least ten graded copies. 32 cards on this page have a PSA 10 price that beats the raw price by more than the grading fee.
What gem rate do Neo Discovery cards get at PSA?
The median across the 32 sampled Neo Discovery cards is 8.6%, so about one in 12 of the copies collectors chose to submit came back PSA 10. The strongest rate with a sample of thirty or more is the Forretress (Neo Discovery #21) at 25.9% of 81.
Does the Neo Discovery ranking apply to CGC or Beckett?
Not directly. The cost column is PSA's fee as of 2026-09-26 and the graded columns are PSA slab prices; the gem-rate sample falls back to CGC's population only when PSA has fewer than ten copies. A CGC or Beckett submission has its own fee and resale price.