cardtrack

Best Neo Discovery Cards to Grade

The Neo Discovery cards worth grading, ranked by expected profit per submission — every grade outcome weighted by how often the card actually receives it — after current grading fees. The PSA 10 best case is shown on every row but does not decide the order. Top pick: Umbreon at an expected +$600.

Worth grading34
With a gem-rate sample34100%
Positive expected value21
Median gem rate9.3%
PSA fees as of2026-09-26

Ranked by expected profit 34

Neo Discovery cards worth grading, ranked by expected grading profit
#CardRawPSA 9PSA 10CostBest caseGem rateExpectedSample
1UmbreonUmbreonNeo Discovery #13 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected +$600 per submission: 1.5% of 7,525 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($36,000), and a PSA 9 ($2,642) still clears the $3,129 you have in it. Confidence high on that sample.
$750$2,642$36,000$2,379+$32,8711.5%+$6007,525
high
2TyranitarTyranitarNeo Discovery #12 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected +$266 per submission: 2.5% of 3,385 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($10,000), and a PSA 9 ($603) still clears the $859 you have in it. Confidence high on that sample.
$140$603$10,000$719+$9,1412.5%+$2663,385
high
3HoundourHoundourNeo Discovery #5 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected +$246 per submission: 0.5% of 1,675 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($50,000), and a PSA 9 ($379) still clears the $2,607 you have in it. Confidence high on that sample.
$88$379$50,000$2,519+$47,3930.5%+$2461,675
high
4EspeonEspeonNeo Discovery #1 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected +$189 per submission: 2% of 4,994 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($13,420), and a PSA 9 ($856) still clears the $1,516 you have in it. Confidence high on that sample.
$363$856$13,420$1,153+$11,9042%+$1894,994
high
5YanmaYanmaNeo Discovery #17 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected +$181 per submission: 1.1% of 1,068 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($20,000), and a PSA 9 ($165) still clears the $1,253 you have in it. Confidence high on that sample.
$34$165$20,000$1,219+$18,7471.1%+$1811,068
high
6UmbreonUmbreonNeo Discovery #32 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected +$135 per submission: 7.7% of 1,626 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($2,255), and a PSA 9 ($340) still clears the $342 you have in it. Confidence high on that sample.
$100$340$2,255$242+$1,9137.7%+$1351,626
high
7KabutopsKabutopsNeo Discovery #6 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected +$116 per submission: 1.6% of 1,709 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($7,999), and a PSA 9 ($400) still clears the $790 you have in it. Confidence high on that sample.
$91$400$7,999$699+$7,2101.6%+$1161,709
high
8TyranitarTyranitarNeo Discovery #31 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected +$116 per submission: 9.5% of 620 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($1,750), and only a PSA 10 covers the $258 you have in it — a 9 loses money. Confidence high on that sample.
$21$101$1,750$237+$1,4939.5%+$116620
high
9UrsaringUrsaringNeo Discovery #15 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected +$79 per submission: 4.6% of 1,010 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($3,000), and a PSA 9 ($142) still clears the $449 you have in it. Confidence high on that sample.
$50$142$3,000$399+$2,5514.6%+$791,010
high
10ForretressForretressNeo Discovery #2 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected +$60 per submission: 7.6% of 800 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($1,500), and only a PSA 10 covers the $141 you have in it — a 9 loses money. Confidence high on that sample.
$26$77$1,500$115+$1,3597.6%+$60800
high
11WobbuffetWobbuffetNeo Discovery #16 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected +$52 per submission: 0.9% of 1,153 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($6,600), and a PSA 9 ($338) still clears the $730 you have in it. Confidence high on that sample.
$45$338$6,600$685+$5,8700.9%+$521,153
high
12SmeargleSmeargleNeo Discovery #11 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected +$39 per submission: 0.4% of 1,034 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($1,117), and a PSA 9 ($650) still clears the $166 you have in it. Confidence high on that sample.
$55$650$1,117$111+$9510.4%+$391,034
high
13WobbuffetWobbuffetNeo Discovery #35 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected +$35 per submission: 23.3% of 73 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($444), and only a PSA 10 covers the $90 you have in it — a 9 loses money. Confidence medium on that sample.
$6$35$444$84+$35423.3%+$3573
medium
14HoundoomHoundoomNeo Discovery #4 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected +$29 per submission: 0.8% of 2,204 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($4,850), and a PSA 9 ($400) still clears the $496 you have in it. Confidence high on that sample.
$78$400$4,850$418+$4,3550.8%+$292,204
high
15IgglybuffIgglybuffNeo Discovery #40 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected +$24 per submission: 16.7% of 78 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($550), and only a PSA 10 covers the $92 you have in it — a 9 loses money. Confidence medium on that sample.
$7$40$550$85+$45816.7%+$2478
medium
16MagnemiteMagnemiteNeo Discovery #7 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected +$22 per submission: 9.3% of 803 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($680), and a PSA 9 ($139) still clears the $122 you have in it. Confidence high on that sample.
$35$139$680$87+$5589.3%+$22803
high
17EspeonEspeonNeo Discovery #20 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected +$18 per submission: 10.8% of 890 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($612), and a PSA 9 ($110) still clears the $111 you have in it. Confidence high on that sample.
$25$110$612$86+$50010.8%+$18890
high
18PolitoedPolitoedNeo Discovery #8 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected +$9 per submission: 1.5% of 1,354 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($1,700), and a PSA 9 ($300) still clears the $306 you have in it. Confidence high on that sample.
$70$300$1,700$236+$1,3941.5%+$91,354
high
19PoliwrathPoliwrathNeo Discovery #9 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected +$7 per submission: 2.1% of 1,242 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($2,800), and a PSA 9 ($146) still clears the $445 you have in it. Confidence high on that sample.
$48$146$2,800$397+$2,3552.1%+$71,242
high
20EeveeEeveeNeo Discovery #38 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected +$5 per submission: 18.6% of 323 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($345), and only a PSA 10 covers the $90 you have in it — a 9 loses money. Confidence high on that sample.
$7$53$345$83+$25518.6%+$5323
high
21PoliwrathPoliwrathNeo Discovery #28 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected +$4 per submission: 22.6% of 84 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($300), and only a PSA 10 covers the $91 you have in it — a 9 loses money. Confidence medium on that sample.
$8$40$300$83+$20922.6%+$484
medium
22ScizorScizorNeo Discovery #29 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected loss −$1 per submission: 14.5% of 200 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($412), and only a PSA 10 covers the $96 you have in it — a 9 loses money. Confidence high on that sample.
$12$47$412$84+$31614.5%−$1200
high
23ForretressForretressNeo Discovery #21 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected loss −$3 per submission: 25.3% of 83 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($233), and only a PSA 10 covers the $90 you have in it — a 9 loses money. Confidence medium on that sample.
$8$75$233$82+$14325.3%−$383
medium
24Unown [A]Unown [A]Neo Discovery #14 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected loss −$4 per submission: 3.4% of 1,490 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($1,000), and a PSA 9 ($95) still clears the $104 you have in it. Confidence high on that sample.
$14$95$1,000$90+$8973.4%−$41,490
high
25HoundoomHoundoomNeo Discovery #23 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected loss −$5 per submission: 14% of 221 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($432), and only a PSA 10 covers the $100 you have in it — a 9 loses money. Confidence high on that sample.
$16$50$432$84+$33214%−$5221
high
26HoundourHoundourNeo Discovery #24 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected loss −$19 per submission: 18.8% of 101 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($222), and only a PSA 10 covers the $99 you have in it — a 9 loses money. Confidence high on that sample.
$17$70$222$82+$12318.8%−$19101
high
27ScizorScizorNeo Discovery #10 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected loss −$20 per submission: 1.2% of 1,697 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($2,026), and a PSA 9 ($377) still clears the $320 you have in it. Confidence high on that sample.
$81$377$2,026$239+$1,7061.2%−$201,697
high
28KabutopsKabutopsNeo Discovery #25 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected loss −$21 per submission: 20.2% of 198 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($203), and only a PSA 10 covers the $97 you have in it — a 9 loses money. Confidence high on that sample.
$15$60$203$82+$10620.2%−$21198
high
29HitmontopHitmontopNeo Discovery #3 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected loss −$28 per submission: 1.2% of 1,609 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($331), and a PSA 9 ($159) still clears the $96 you have in it. Confidence high on that sample.
$13$159$331$83+$2341.2%−$281,609
high
30SmeargleSmeargleNeo Discovery #30 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected loss −$30 per submission: 14.9% of 87 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($255), and only a PSA 10 covers the $93 you have in it — a 9 loses money. Confidence medium on that sample.
$10$40$255$83+$16214.9%−$3087
medium
31UrsaringUrsaringNeo Discovery #34 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected loss −$38 per submission: 18.6% of 86 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($126), and only a PSA 10 covers the $87 you have in it — a 9 loses money. Confidence medium on that sample.
$6$37$126$81+$3818.6%−$3886
medium
32HitmontopHitmontopNeo Discovery #22 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected loss −$49 per submission: 16.1% of 87 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($90), and only a PSA 10 covers the $87 you have in it — a 9 loses money. Confidence medium on that sample.
$6$35$90$81+$316.1%−$4987
medium
33PolitoedPolitoedNeo Discovery #27 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected loss −$50 per submission: 21.3% of 127 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($100), and only a PSA 10 covers the $97 you have in it — a 9 loses money. Confidence high on that sample.
$16$48$100$81+$421.3%−$50127
high
34MagnemiteMagnemiteNeo Discovery #26 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected loss −$52 per submission: 14.1% of 99 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($116), and only a PSA 10 covers the $88 you have in it — a 9 loses money. Confidence medium on that sample.
$7$28$116$81+$2714.1%−$5299
medium

Expected = every grade outcome weighted by its share of the card's graded population, minus the raw price and the grading cost (PSA tier fee for the graded value plus ~$20 round-trip shipping, fees as of 2026-09-26). Best case is the PSA 10 leg alone. Gem rates come from a self-selected population — collectors grade their cleanest copies — so read them as an upper bound. Raw is a blended market price, not a sale of your copy. Full method and filters on the grading index.

How to read the Neo Discovery ranking

Every Neo Discovery card listed here clears one bar: its PSA 10 price beats its raw price by more than the cost of grading it. 34 cards from the set pass. 34 of them (100%) have a gem-rate sample of at least ten graded copies in the population reports, and 21 of those keep a positive expected value once every grade outcome is weighted by how often the card actually receives it.

The order is expected profit, not the PSA 10 best case, which rewards the widest raw-to-gem gap whether the card gems one time in two or one in fifty. Here the top row, the Umbreon from Neo Discovery, gems 1.5% of the time across 7,525 graded copies: +$600 is what a long run of submissions would average, $32,871 is what one lucky copy returns.

The median gem rate across the sampled Neo Discovery cards is 9.3%. Roughly one submitted copy in 11 came back PSA 10, and most rows here still cover raw price plus fee at PSA 9, so the PSA 9 price does most of the work. Of the 34 ranked cards, 18 still cover raw price plus fee at PSA 9, 16 need a 10 to break even and 13 lose money on expectation. 26 rest on a hundred or more graded copies.

Before you submit a Neo Discovery card

Grading pays on condition. The four things every grader scores — centering, corners, edges and surface — can be checked at home before paying a fee, and a copy that is visibly off-centre or has a whitened corner will not gem whatever the population says. Those gem rates come from a self-selected population of clean copies, so a random copy does worse.

The cost column assumes a PSA submission at the tier covering the card's PSA 10 value, fees as of 2026-09-26, and raw is CardTrack's blended near-mint price, not a sale of your copy: pay more, or hold a lighter copy, and the break-even moves against you. Test a card with your own numbers in the ROI calculator, see the printings that fail the bar on the Neo Discovery card list, or see how gem-mint premiums run across the whole catalogue on the PSA premium index.

Neo Discovery grading questions

Which Neo Discovery card is the best to grade?
On current numbers the Umbreon (Neo Discovery #13): 1.5% of 7,525 graded copies came back PSA 10, an expected profit of $600 per submission after the $2,379 grading cost, against a best case of $32,871 if it gems.
How many Neo Discovery cards are worth grading?
21 keep a positive expected value after the fee, out of the 34 with a gem-rate sample of at least ten graded copies. 34 cards on this page have a PSA 10 price that beats the raw price by more than the grading fee.
What gem rate do Neo Discovery cards get at PSA?
The median across the 34 sampled Neo Discovery cards is 9.3%, so about one in 11 of the copies collectors chose to submit came back PSA 10. The strongest rate with a sample of thirty or more is the Forretress (Neo Discovery #21) at 25.3% of 83.
Does the Neo Discovery ranking apply to CGC or Beckett?
Not directly. The cost column is PSA's fee as of 2026-09-26 and the graded columns are PSA slab prices; the gem-rate sample falls back to CGC's population only when PSA has fewer than ten copies. A CGC or Beckett submission has its own fee and resale price.