cardtrack

Best Phantasmal Flames Cards to Grade

The Phantasmal Flames cards worth grading, ranked by expected profit per submission — every grade outcome weighted by how often the card actually receives it — after current grading fees. The PSA 10 best case is shown on every row but does not decide the order. Top pick: Mega Charizard X ex at an expected +$536.

Worth grading5
With a gem-rate sample5100%
Positive expected value2
Median gem rate48.8%
PSA fees as of2026-09-26

Ranked by expected profit 5

Phantasmal Flames cards worth grading, ranked by expected grading profit
#CardRawPSA 9PSA 10CostBest caseGem rateExpectedSample
1Mega Charizard X exMega Charizard X exPhantasmal Flames #125 · Current (2020–)
Expected +$536 per submission: 60.2% of 40,630 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($1,920), and only a PSA 10 covers the $941 you have in it — a 9 loses money. Confidence high on that sample.
$703$660$1,920$238+$97860.2%+$53640,630
high
2Mega Charizard X exMega Charizard X exPhantasmal Flames #130 · Current (2020–)
Expected +$110 per submission: 10.7% of 14,515 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($2,325), and only a PSA 10 covers the $522 you have in it — a 9 loses money. Confidence high on that sample.
$280$288$2,325$242+$1,80310.7%+$11014,515
high
3MeowthMeowthPhantasmal Flames #106 · Current (2020–)
Expected loss −$18 per submission: 46.5% of 21,196 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($140), and only a PSA 10 covers the $100 you have in it — a 9 loses money. Confidence high on that sample.
$19$35$140$81+$4046.5%−$1821,196
high
4Mega Charizard X exMega Charizard X exPhantasmal Flames #109 · Current (2020–)
Expected loss −$18 per submission: 55.1% of 25,501 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($126), and only a PSA 10 covers the $104 you have in it — a 9 loses money. Confidence high on that sample.
$23$38$126$81+$2255.1%−$1825,501
high
5PiplupPiplupPhantasmal Flames #98 · Current (2020–)
Expected loss −$32 per submission: 48.8% of 12,760 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($103), and only a PSA 10 covers the $94 you have in it — a 9 loses money. Confidence high on that sample.
$13$25$103$81+$948.8%−$3212,760
high

Expected = every grade outcome weighted by its share of the card's graded population, minus the raw price and the grading cost (PSA tier fee for the graded value plus ~$20 round-trip shipping, fees as of 2026-09-26). Best case is the PSA 10 leg alone. Gem rates come from a self-selected population — collectors grade their cleanest copies — so read them as an upper bound. Raw is a blended market price, not a sale of your copy. Full method and filters on the grading index.

How to read the Phantasmal Flames ranking

Every Phantasmal Flames card listed here clears one bar: its PSA 10 price beats its raw price by more than the cost of grading it. 5 cards from the set pass. 5 of them (100%) have a gem-rate sample of at least ten graded copies in the population reports, and 2 of those keep a positive expected value once every grade outcome is weighted by how often the card actually receives it.

The order is expected profit, not the PSA 10 best case, which rewards the widest raw-to-gem gap whether the card gems one time in two or one in fifty. Here the top row, the Mega Charizard X ex from Phantasmal Flames, gems 60.2% of the time across 40,630 graded copies: +$536 is what a long run of submissions would average, $978 is what one lucky copy returns.

The median gem rate across the sampled Phantasmal Flames cards is 48.8%. Roughly one submitted copy in 2 came back PSA 10, and no row here covers raw price plus fee at PSA 9, so the gem rate decides whether a submission pays. Of the 5 ranked cards, 5 need a 10 to break even and 3 lose money on expectation. 5 rest on a hundred or more graded copies.

Before you submit a Phantasmal Flames card

Grading pays on condition. The four things every grader scores — centering, corners, edges and surface — can be checked at home before paying a fee, and a copy that is visibly off-centre or has a whitened corner will not gem whatever the population says. Those gem rates come from a self-selected population of clean copies, so a random copy does worse.

The cost column assumes a PSA submission at the tier covering the card's PSA 10 value, fees as of 2026-09-26, and raw is CardTrack's blended near-mint price, not a sale of your copy: pay more, or hold a lighter copy, and the break-even moves against you. Test a card with your own numbers in the ROI calculator, see the printings that fail the bar on the Phantasmal Flames card list, or see how gem-mint premiums run across the whole catalogue on the PSA premium index.

Phantasmal Flames grading questions

Which Phantasmal Flames card is the best to grade?
On current numbers the Mega Charizard X ex (Phantasmal Flames #125): 60.2% of 40,630 graded copies came back PSA 10, an expected profit of $536 per submission after the $238 grading cost, against a best case of $978 if it gems.
How many Phantasmal Flames cards are worth grading?
2 keep a positive expected value after the fee, out of the 5 with a gem-rate sample of at least ten graded copies. 5 cards on this page have a PSA 10 price that beats the raw price by more than the grading fee.
What gem rate do Phantasmal Flames cards get at PSA?
The median across the 5 sampled Phantasmal Flames cards is 48.8%, so about one in 2 of the copies collectors chose to submit came back PSA 10. The strongest rate with a sample of thirty or more is the Mega Charizard X ex (Phantasmal Flames #125) at 60.2% of 40,630.
Does the Phantasmal Flames ranking apply to CGC or Beckett?
Not directly. The cost column is PSA's fee as of 2026-09-26 and the graded columns are PSA slab prices; the gem-rate sample falls back to CGC's population only when PSA has fewer than ten copies. A CGC or Beckett submission has its own fee and resale price.