cardtrack

Best Rising Rivals Cards to Grade

The Rising Rivals cards worth grading, ranked by expected profit per submission — every grade outcome weighted by how often the card actually receives it — after current grading fees. The PSA 10 best case is shown on every row but does not decide the order. Top pick: Snorlax LV.X at an expected +$3,856.

Worth grading36
With a gem-rate sample3289%
Positive expected value23
Median gem rate5%
PSA fees as of2026-09-26

Ranked by expected profit 32

Rising Rivals cards worth grading, ranked by expected grading profit
#CardRawPSA 9PSA 10CostBest caseGem rateExpectedSample
1Snorlax LV.XSnorlax LV.XRising Rivals #111 · Classic (2004–2010)
Expected +$3,856 per submission: 2.8% of 904 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($81,047), and a PSA 9 ($16,000) still clears the $5,629 you have in it. Confidence high on that sample.
$1,800$16,000$81,047$3,829+$75,4172.8%+$3,856904
high
2Flygon LV.XFlygon LV.XRising Rivals #105 · Classic (2004–2010)
Expected +$1,168 per submission: 4.8% of 356 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($19,250), and a PSA 9 ($1,200) still clears the $1,384 you have in it. Confidence high on that sample.
$172$1,200$19,250$1,212+$17,8664.8%+$1,168356
high
3Luxray GL LV.XLuxray GL LV.XRising Rivals #109 · Classic (2004–2010)
Expected +$1,065 per submission: 7.2% of 375 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($12,000), and a PSA 9 ($1,200) still clears the $1,279 you have in it. Confidence high on that sample.
$140$1,200$12,000$1,139+$10,7217.2%+$1,065375
high
4Wash RotomWash RotomRising Rivals #RT5 · Classic (2004–2010)
Expected +$980 per submission: 10.4% of 115 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($10,800), and a PSA 9 ($180) still clears the $1,172 you have in it. Confidence high on that sample.
$45$180$10,800$1,127+$9,62810.4%+$980115
high
5Hippowdon LV.XHippowdon LV.XRising Rivals #107 · Classic (2004–2010)
Expected +$746 per submission: 5% of 318 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($12,000), and a PSA 9 ($800) still clears the $1,218 you have in it. Confidence high on that sample.
$79$800$12,000$1,139+$10,7825%+$746318
high
6Fan RotomFan RotomRising Rivals #RT1 · Classic (2004–2010)
Expected +$682 per submission: 10.3% of 107 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($7,800), and a PSA 9 ($149) still clears the $740 you have in it. Confidence high on that sample.
$43$149$7,800$697+$7,06010.3%+$682107
high
7Floatzel GL LV.XFloatzel GL LV.XRising Rivals #104 · Classic (2004–2010)
Expected +$653 per submission: 6.9% of 360 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($9,000), and a PSA 9 ($549) still clears the $834 you have in it. Confidence high on that sample.
$125$549$9,000$709+$8,1666.9%+$653360
high
8PikachuPikachuRising Rivals #112 · Classic (2004–2010)
Expected +$629 per submission: 1.6% of 681 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($10,500), and a PSA 9 ($3,000) still clears the $1,399 you have in it. Confidence high on that sample.
$275$3,000$10,500$1,124+$9,1011.6%+$629681
high
9Mismagius GL LV.XMismagius GL LV.XRising Rivals #110 · Classic (2004–2010)
Expected +$586 per submission: 4.6% of 306 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($8,211), and a PSA 9 ($900) still clears the $788 you have in it. Confidence high on that sample.
$87$900$8,211$701+$7,4234.6%+$586306
high
10Mow RotomMow RotomRising Rivals #RT4 · Classic (2004–2010)
Expected +$484 per submission: 6.4% of 110 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($8,100), and a PSA 9 ($203) still clears the $735 you have in it. Confidence high on that sample.
$35$203$8,100$700+$7,3656.4%+$484110
high
11JirachiJirachiRising Rivals #7 · Classic (2004–2010)
Expected +$432 per submission: 6.6% of 182 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($5,880), and a PSA 9 ($500) still clears the $715 you have in it. Confidence high on that sample.
$37$500$5,880$678+$5,1656.6%+$432182
high
12Frost RotomFrost RotomRising Rivals #RT2 · Classic (2004–2010)
Expected +$420 per submission: 6.6% of 136 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($6,900), and a PSA 9 ($299) still clears the $722 you have in it. Confidence high on that sample.
$34$299$6,900$688+$6,1786.6%+$420136
high
13Surfing PikachuSurfing PikachuRising Rivals #114 · Classic (2004–2010)
Expected +$319 per submission: 2% of 596 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($2,500), and a PSA 9 ($1,150) still clears the $494 you have in it. Confidence high on that sample.
$250$1,150$2,500$244+$2,0062%+$319596
high
14FlygonFlygonRising Rivals #5 · Classic (2004–2010)
Expected +$272 per submission: 4.7% of 127 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($5,160), and a PSA 9 ($500) still clears the $691 you have in it. Confidence high on that sample.
$20$500$5,160$671+$4,4694.7%+$272127
high
15Charon's ChoiceCharon's ChoiceRising Rivals #RT6 · Classic (2004–2010)
Expected +$213 per submission: 11.2% of 98 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($2,520), and a PSA 9 ($130) still clears the $411 you have in it. Confidence medium on that sample.
$17$130$2,520$394+$2,10911.2%+$21398
medium
16ArcanineArcanineRising Rivals #1 · Classic (2004–2010)
Expected +$157 per submission: 2.5% of 326 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($4,325), and a PSA 9 ($315) still clears the $446 you have in it. Confidence high on that sample.
$34$315$4,325$412+$3,8782.5%+$157326
high
17Darkrai GDarkrai GRising Rivals #3 · Classic (2004–2010)
Expected +$119 per submission: 2.7% of 226 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($825), and a PSA 9 ($600) still clears the $188 you have in it. Confidence high on that sample.
$100$600$825$88+$6372.7%+$119226
high
18Froslass GLFroslass GLRising Rivals #6 · Classic (2004–2010)
Expected +$106 per submission: 4% of 100 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($3,500), and a PSA 9 ($154) still clears the $414 you have in it. Confidence high on that sample.
$10$154$3,500$404+$3,0864%+$106100
high
19Gengar GLGengar GLRising Rivals #40 · Classic (2004–2010)
Expected +$101 per submission: 5.8% of 293 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($1,925), and a PSA 9 ($250) still clears the $258 you have in it. Confidence high on that sample.
$20$250$1,925$238+$1,6675.8%+$101293
high
20SnorlaxSnorlaxRising Rivals #81 · Classic (2004–2010)
Expected +$85 per submission: 6.9% of 87 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($1,500), and a PSA 9 ($175) still clears the $123 you have in it. Confidence medium on that sample.
$8$175$1,500$115+$1,3786.9%+$8587
medium
21Lucario GLLucario GLRising Rivals #8 · Classic (2004–2010)
Expected +$84 per submission: 2.5% of 160 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($2,640), and a PSA 9 ($399) still clears the $425 you have in it. Confidence high on that sample.
$30$399$2,640$395+$2,2152.5%+$84160
high
22SnorlaxSnorlaxRising Rivals #33 · Classic (2004–2010)
Expected +$36 per submission: 10.3% of 39 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($1,000), and only a PSA 10 covers the $120 you have in it — a 9 loses money. Confidence medium on that sample.
$30$85$1,000$90+$88010.3%+$3639
medium
23Mismagius GLMismagius GLRising Rivals #10 · Classic (2004–2010)
Expected +$13 per submission: 2.1% of 94 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($2,040), and a PSA 9 ($125) still clears the $250 you have in it. Confidence medium on that sample.
$11$125$2,040$239+$1,7892.1%+$1394
medium
24Heat RotomHeat RotomRising Rivals #RT3 · Classic (2004–2010)
Expected loss −$8 per submission: 6.3% of 96 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($355), and a PSA 9 ($114) still clears the $109 you have in it. Confidence medium on that sample.
$25$114$355$84+$2466.3%−$896
medium
25Bastiodon GLBastiodon GLRising Rivals #2 · Classic (2004–2010)
Expected loss −$12 per submission: 3.7% of 82 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($218), and a PSA 9 ($161) still clears the $91 you have in it. Confidence medium on that sample.
$9$161$218$82+$1273.7%−$1282
medium
26Rampardos GLRampardos GLRising Rivals #11 · Classic (2004–2010)
Expected loss −$15 per submission: 1.8% of 57 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($172), and a PSA 9 ($143) still clears the $94 you have in it. Confidence medium on that sample.
$12$143$172$82+$781.8%−$1557
medium
27Floatzel GLFloatzel GLRising Rivals #4 · Classic (2004–2010)
Expected loss −$37 per submission: 2.9% of 70 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($157), and a PSA 9 ($110) still clears the $90 you have in it. Confidence medium on that sample.
$8$110$157$82+$672.9%−$3770
medium
28MunchlaxMunchlaxRising Rivals #69 · Classic (2004–2010)
Expected loss −$44 per submission: 5.9% of 51 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($128), and only a PSA 10 covers the $93 you have in it — a 9 loses money. Confidence medium on that sample.
$12$79$128$81+$355.9%−$4451
medium
29MunchlaxMunchlaxRising Rivals #70 · Classic (2004–2010)
Expected loss −$48 per submission: 14.3% of 21 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($161), and only a PSA 10 covers the $91 you have in it — a 9 loses money. Confidence low on that sample.
$9$25$161$82+$6914.3%−$4821
low
30GlaceonGlaceonRising Rivals #41 · Classic (2004–2010)
Expected loss −$52 per submission: 1.7% of 58 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($114), and only a PSA 10 covers the $87 you have in it — a 9 loses money. Confidence medium on that sample.
$6$40$114$81+$271.7%−$5258
medium
31JolteonJolteonRising Rivals #26 · Classic (2004–2010)
Expected loss −$52 per submission: 13.2% of 38 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($120), and only a PSA 10 covers the $94 you have in it — a 9 loses money. Confidence medium on that sample.
$13$42$120$81+$2613.2%−$5238
medium
32Raichu GLRaichu GLRising Rivals #31 · Classic (2004–2010)
Expected loss −$52 per submission: 2.6% of 38 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($113), and only a PSA 10 covers the $88 you have in it — a 9 loses money. Confidence medium on that sample.
$7$47$113$81+$252.6%−$5238
medium

Best case only — no gem-rate evidence 4

Fewer than 10 graded copies in the PSA and CGC population reports. They clear the grading cost if they gem — that is all the numbers support.

Rising Rivals cards that clear the grading cost at PSA 10 but have no measurable gem rate
#CardRawPSA 9PSA 10CostBest caseGem rateExpectedSample
33Infernape E4 LV.XInfernape E4 LV.XRising Rivals #108 · Classic (2004–2010)$250—$264,000$7,659+$256,091——none
<10
34Gallade E4 LV.XGallade E4 LV.XRising Rivals #106 · Classic (2004–2010)$118—$66,000$3,679+$62,203——none
<10
35Alakazam E4 LV.XAlakazam E4 LV.XRising Rivals #103 · Classic (2004–2010)$314—$35,700$2,376+$33,010——none
<10
36Espeon E4Espeon E4Rising Rivals #18 · Classic (2004–2010)$13—$1,999$239+$1,747——none
<10

Expected = every grade outcome weighted by its share of the card's graded population, minus the raw price and the grading cost (PSA tier fee for the graded value plus ~$20 round-trip shipping, fees as of 2026-09-26). Best case is the PSA 10 leg alone. Gem rates come from a self-selected population — collectors grade their cleanest copies — so read them as an upper bound. Raw is a blended market price, not a sale of your copy. Full method and filters on the grading index.

How to read the Rising Rivals ranking

Every Rising Rivals card listed here clears one bar: its PSA 10 price beats its raw price by more than the cost of grading it. 36 cards from the set pass. 32 of them (89%) have a gem-rate sample of at least ten graded copies in the population reports, and 23 of those keep a positive expected value once every grade outcome is weighted by how often the card actually receives it.

The order is expected profit, not the PSA 10 best case, which rewards the widest raw-to-gem gap whether the card gems one time in two or one in fifty. Here the top row, the Snorlax LV.X from Rising Rivals, gems 2.8% of the time across 904 graded copies: +$3,856 is what a long run of submissions would average, $75,417 is what one lucky copy returns.

The median gem rate across the sampled Rising Rivals cards is 5%. Roughly one submitted copy in 20 came back PSA 10, and most rows here still cover raw price plus fee at PSA 9, so the PSA 9 price does most of the work. Of the 32 ranked cards, 26 still cover raw price plus fee at PSA 9, 6 need a 10 to break even and 9 lose money on expectation. 19 rest on a hundred or more graded copies.

4 cards sit below the ranking with a best case only, fewer than ten graded copies.

Before you submit a Rising Rivals card

Grading pays on condition. The four things every grader scores — centering, corners, edges and surface — can be checked at home before paying a fee, and a copy that is visibly off-centre or has a whitened corner will not gem whatever the population says. Those gem rates come from a self-selected population of clean copies, so a random copy does worse.

The cost column assumes a PSA submission at the tier covering the card's PSA 10 value, fees as of 2026-09-26, and raw is CardTrack's blended near-mint price, not a sale of your copy: pay more, or hold a lighter copy, and the break-even moves against you. Test a card with your own numbers in the ROI calculator, see the printings that fail the bar on the Rising Rivals card list, or see how gem-mint premiums run across the whole catalogue on the PSA premium index.

Rising Rivals grading questions

Which Rising Rivals card is the best to grade?
On current numbers the Snorlax LV.X (Rising Rivals #111): 2.8% of 904 graded copies came back PSA 10, an expected profit of $3,856 per submission after the $3,829 grading cost, against a best case of $75,417 if it gems.
How many Rising Rivals cards are worth grading?
23 keep a positive expected value after the fee, out of the 32 with a gem-rate sample of at least ten graded copies. The best case is broader: 36 cards on this page have a PSA 10 price that beats the raw price by more than the grading fee. The other 4 are best case only.
What gem rate do Rising Rivals cards get at PSA?
The median across the 32 sampled Rising Rivals cards is 5%, so about one in 20 of the copies collectors chose to submit came back PSA 10. The strongest rate with a sample of thirty or more is the Jolteon (Rising Rivals #26) at 13.2% of 38.
Does the Rising Rivals ranking apply to CGC or Beckett?
Not directly. The cost column is PSA's fee as of 2026-09-26 and the graded columns are PSA slab prices; the gem-rate sample falls back to CGC's population only when PSA has fewer than ten copies. A CGC or Beckett submission has its own fee and resale price.