cardtrack

Best Base Cards to Grade

The Base cards worth grading, ranked by expected profit per submission — every grade outcome weighted by how often the card actually receives it — after current grading fees. The PSA 10 best case is shown on every row but does not decide the order. Top pick: Zapdos at an expected +$304.

Worth grading30
With a gem-rate sample30100%
Positive expected value21
Median gem rate9.6%
PSA fees as of2026-09-26

Ranked by expected profit 30

Base cards worth grading, ranked by expected grading profit
#CardRawPSA 9PSA 10CostBest caseGem rateExpectedSample
1ZapdosZapdosBase #16 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected +$304 per submission: 3.6% of 18,774 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($2,155), and a PSA 9 ($1,348) still clears the $275 you have in it. Confidence high on that sample.
$34$1,348$2,155$241+$1,8813.6%+$30418,774
high
2CharizardCharizardBase #4 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected +$119 per submission: 0.5% of 101,139 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($22,500), and a PSA 9 ($3,665) still clears the $2,061 you have in it. Confidence high on that sample.
$817$3,665$22,500$1,244+$20,4390.5%+$119101,139
high
3MachampMachampBase #8 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected +$108 per submission: 0.2% of 7,548 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($13,800), and a PSA 9 ($1,100) still clears the $1,190 you have in it. Confidence high on that sample.
$33$1,100$13,800$1,157+$12,6100.2%+$1087,548
high
4MewtwoMewtwoBase #10 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected +$99 per submission: 2% of 30,089 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($4,560), and a PSA 9 ($470) still clears the $488 you have in it. Confidence high on that sample.
$73$470$4,560$415+$4,0722%+$9930,089
high
5AlakazamAlakazamBase #1 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected +$99 per submission: 2.3% of 19,817 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($4,500), and a PSA 9 ($365) still clears the $474 you have in it. Confidence high on that sample.
$60$365$4,500$414+$4,0262.3%+$9919,817
high
6BlastoiseBlastoiseBase #2 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected +$96 per submission: 0.8% of 50,300 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($12,690), and a PSA 9 ($1,015) still clears the $1,346 you have in it. Confidence high on that sample.
$200$1,015$12,690$1,146+$11,3440.8%+$9650,300
high
7ChanseyChanseyBase #3 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected +$81 per submission: 0.9% of 15,836 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($9,760), and a PSA 9 ($403) still clears the $754 you have in it. Confidence high on that sample.
$37$403$9,760$717+$9,0060.9%+$8115,836
high
8HitmonchanHitmonchanBase #7 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected +$54 per submission: 1.2% of 16,969 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($1,982), and a PSA 9 ($648) still clears the $259 you have in it. Confidence high on that sample.
$20$648$1,982$239+$1,7231.2%+$5416,969
high
9GyaradosGyaradosBase #6 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected +$52 per submission: 2.2% of 24,481 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($3,275), and a PSA 9 ($300) still clears the $452 you have in it. Confidence high on that sample.
$50$300$3,275$402+$2,8242.2%+$5224,481
high
10VenusaurVenusaurBase #15 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected +$49 per submission: 1.3% of 45,513 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($4,565), and a PSA 9 ($650) still clears the $564 you have in it. Confidence high on that sample.
$149$650$4,565$415+$4,0011.3%+$4945,513
high
11RaichuRaichuBase #14 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected +$48 per submission: 1.5% of 16,742 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($3,999), and a PSA 9 ($353) still clears the $470 you have in it. Confidence high on that sample.
$61$353$3,999$409+$3,5291.5%+$4816,742
high
12NidokingNidokingBase #11 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected +$39 per submission: 2.4% of 15,667 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($2,500), and a PSA 9 ($237) still clears the $279 you have in it. Confidence high on that sample.
$35$237$2,500$244+$2,2212.4%+$3915,667
high
13SquirtleSquirtleBase #63 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected +$31 per submission: 17.2% of 12,400 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($414), and a PSA 9 ($90) still clears the $89 you have in it. Confidence high on that sample.
$5$90$414$84+$32517.2%+$3112,400
high
14Devolution SprayDevolution SprayBase #72 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected +$19 per submission: 20.8% of 792 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($313), and only a PSA 10 covers the $89 you have in it — a 9 loses money. Confidence high on that sample.
$6$86$313$83+$22420.8%+$19792
high
15PoliwrathPoliwrathBase #13 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected +$18 per submission: 3.8% of 14,999 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($1,138), and a PSA 9 ($175) still clears the $143 you have in it. Confidence high on that sample.
$32$175$1,138$111+$9943.8%+$1814,999
high
16NinetalesNinetalesBase #12 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected +$14 per submission: 2.3% of 20,731 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($1,788), and a PSA 9 ($200) still clears the $265 you have in it. Confidence high on that sample.
$28$200$1,788$237+$1,5232.3%+$1420,731
high
17MagnetonMagnetonBase #9 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected +$10 per submission: 1.5% of 12,886 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($3,150), and a PSA 9 ($254) still clears the $436 you have in it. Confidence high on that sample.
$35$254$3,150$401+$2,7151.5%+$1012,886
high
18DragonairDragonairBase #18 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected +$10 per submission: 12.8% of 2,444 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($484), and only a PSA 10 covers the $100 you have in it — a 9 loses money. Confidence high on that sample.
$15$80$484$85+$38412.8%+$102,444
high
19Clefairy DollClefairy DollBase #70 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected +$10 per submission: 20.4% of 941 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($321), and only a PSA 10 covers the $91 you have in it — a 9 loses money. Confidence high on that sample.
$8$60$321$83+$23020.4%+$10941
high
20WartortleWartortleBase #42 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected +$7 per submission: 14.9% of 5,550 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($305), and only a PSA 10 covers the $89 you have in it — a 9 loses money. Confidence high on that sample.
$6$77$305$83+$21614.9%+$75,550
high
21PikachuPikachuBase #58 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected +$2 per submission: 9.9% of 7,570 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($625), and only a PSA 10 covers the $96 you have in it — a 9 loses money. Confidence high on that sample.
$10$87$625$86+$5299.9%+$27,570
high
22IvysaurIvysaurBase #30 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected loss −$6 per submission: 15.9% of 5,419 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($262), and only a PSA 10 covers the $88 you have in it — a 9 loses money. Confidence high on that sample.
$5$61$262$83+$17415.9%−$65,419
high
23ElectabuzzElectabuzzBase #20 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected loss −$11 per submission: 18.5% of 1,676 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($253), and only a PSA 10 covers the $93 you have in it — a 9 loses money. Confidence high on that sample.
$10$58$253$83+$16018.5%−$111,676
high
24Pokémon BreederPokémon BreederBase #76 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected loss −$17 per submission: 20.8% of 849 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($276), and only a PSA 10 covers the $90 you have in it — a 9 loses money. Confidence high on that sample.
$7$19$276$83+$18620.8%−$17849
high
25PidgeottoPidgeottoBase #22 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected loss −$19 per submission: 16.4% of 1,463 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($276), and only a PSA 10 covers the $93 you have in it — a 9 loses money. Confidence high on that sample.
$10$52$276$83+$18416.4%−$191,463
high
26ElectrodeElectrodeBase #21 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected loss −$20 per submission: 17.4% of 1,490 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($264), and only a PSA 10 covers the $92 you have in it — a 9 loses money. Confidence high on that sample.
$9$53$264$83+$17317.4%−$201,490
high
27Scoop UpScoop UpBase #78 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected loss −$24 per submission: 21.3% of 689 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($198), and only a PSA 10 covers the $90 you have in it — a 9 loses money. Confidence high on that sample.
$8$35$198$82+$10821.3%−$24689
high
28BeedrillBeedrillBase #17 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected loss −$30 per submission: 21.2% of 1,966 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($148), and only a PSA 10 covers the $87 you have in it — a 9 loses money. Confidence high on that sample.
$6$37$148$81+$6021.2%−$301,966
high
29DugtrioDugtrioBase #19 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected loss −$31 per submission: 19.8% of 1,215 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($156), and only a PSA 10 covers the $93 you have in it — a 9 loses money. Confidence high on that sample.
$11$60$156$82+$6419.8%−$311,215
high
30Impostor Professor OakImpostor Professor OakBase #73 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected loss −$32 per submission: 9.6% of 249 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($336), and only a PSA 10 covers the $90 you have in it — a 9 loses money. Confidence high on that sample.
$7$66$336$83+$2469.6%−$32249
high

Expected = every grade outcome weighted by its share of the card's graded population, minus the raw price and the grading cost (PSA tier fee for the graded value plus ~$20 round-trip shipping, fees as of 2026-09-26). Best case is the PSA 10 leg alone. Gem rates come from a self-selected population — collectors grade their cleanest copies — so read them as an upper bound. Raw is a blended market price, not a sale of your copy. Full method and filters on the grading index.

How to read the Base ranking

Every Base card listed here clears one bar: its PSA 10 price beats its raw price by more than the cost of grading it. 30 cards from the set pass. 30 of them (100%) have a gem-rate sample of at least ten graded copies in the population reports, and 21 of those keep a positive expected value once every grade outcome is weighted by how often the card actually receives it.

The order is expected profit, not the PSA 10 best case, which rewards the widest raw-to-gem gap whether the card gems one time in two or one in fifty. Here the top row, the Zapdos from Base, gems 3.6% of the time across 18,774 graded copies: +$304 is what a long run of submissions would average, $1,881 is what one lucky copy returns.

The median gem rate across the sampled Base cards is 9.6%. Roughly one submitted copy in 10 came back PSA 10, and most rows here still cover raw price plus fee at PSA 9, so the PSA 9 price does most of the work. Of the 30 ranked cards, 16 still cover raw price plus fee at PSA 9, 14 need a 10 to break even and 9 lose money on expectation. 30 rest on a hundred or more graded copies.

Before you submit a Base card

Grading pays on condition. The four things every grader scores — centering, corners, edges and surface — can be checked at home before paying a fee, and a copy that is visibly off-centre or has a whitened corner will not gem whatever the population says. Those gem rates come from a self-selected population of clean copies, so a random copy does worse.

The cost column assumes a PSA submission at the tier covering the card's PSA 10 value, fees as of 2026-09-26, and raw is CardTrack's blended near-mint price, not a sale of your copy: pay more, or hold a lighter copy, and the break-even moves against you. Test a card with your own numbers in the ROI calculator, see the printings that fail the bar on the Base card list, or see how gem-mint premiums run across the whole catalogue on the PSA premium index.

Base grading questions

Which Base card is the best to grade?
On current numbers the Zapdos (Base #16): 3.6% of 18,774 graded copies came back PSA 10, an expected profit of $304 per submission after the $241 grading cost, against a best case of $1,881 if it gems.
How many Base cards are worth grading?
21 keep a positive expected value after the fee, out of the 30 with a gem-rate sample of at least ten graded copies. 30 cards on this page have a PSA 10 price that beats the raw price by more than the grading fee.
What gem rate do Base cards get at PSA?
The median across the 30 sampled Base cards is 9.6%, so about one in 10 of the copies collectors chose to submit came back PSA 10. The strongest rate with a sample of thirty or more is the Scoop Up (Base #78) at 21.3% of 689.
Does the Base ranking apply to CGC or Beckett?
Not directly. The cost column is PSA's fee as of 2026-09-26 and the graded columns are PSA slab prices; the gem-rate sample falls back to CGC's population only when PSA has fewer than ten copies. A CGC or Beckett submission has its own fee and resale price.