cardtrack

Best Neo Revelation Cards to Grade

The Neo Revelation cards worth grading, ranked by expected profit per submission — every grade outcome weighted by how often the card actually receives it — after current grading fees. The PSA 10 best case is shown on every row but does not decide the order. Top pick: Shining Magikarp at an expected +$170.

Worth grading30
With a gem-rate sample30100%
Positive expected value13
Median gem rate13%
PSA fees as of2026-09-26

Ranked by expected profit 30

Neo Revelation cards worth grading, ranked by expected grading profit
#CardRawPSA 9PSA 10CostBest caseGem rateExpectedSample
1Shining MagikarpShining MagikarpNeo Revelation #66 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected +$170 per submission: 1% of 6,842 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($27,000), and a PSA 9 ($2,350) still clears the $3,084 you have in it. Confidence high on that sample.
$795$2,350$27,000$2,289+$23,9161%+$1706,842
high
2LugiaLugiaNeo Revelation #20 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected +$157 per submission: 13% of 638 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($1,050), and a PSA 9 ($350) still clears the $161 you have in it. Confidence high on that sample.
$51$350$1,050$110+$88913%+$157638
high
3CelebiCelebiNeo Revelation #3 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected +$155 per submission: 2.3% of 1,950 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($3,151), and a PSA 9 ($545) still clears the $491 you have in it. Confidence high on that sample.
$90$545$3,151$401+$2,6602.3%+$1551,950
high
4Shining GyaradosShining GyaradosNeo Revelation #65 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected +$105 per submission: 1.4% of 8,106 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($18,772), and a PSA 9 ($2,400) still clears the $2,506 you have in it. Confidence high on that sample.
$1,299$2,400$18,772$1,207+$16,2661.4%+$1058,106
high
5Rocket's HideoutRocket's HideoutNeo Revelation #63 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected +$46 per submission: 12.1% of 140 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($671), and a PSA 9 ($99) still clears the $102 you have in it. Confidence high on that sample.
$15$99$671$87+$56912.1%+$46140
high
6HoundoomHoundoomNeo Revelation #8 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected +$43 per submission: 0.4% of 2,697 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($14,688), and a PSA 9 ($1,638) still clears the $1,635 you have in it. Confidence high on that sample.
$469$1,638$14,688$1,166+$13,0530.4%+$432,697
high
7QuagsireQuagsireNeo Revelation #48 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected +$35 per submission: 46.5% of 86 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($210), and only a PSA 10 covers the $88 you have in it — a 9 loses money. Confidence medium on that sample.
$6$60$210$82+$12246.5%+$3586
medium
8SuicuneSuicuneNeo Revelation #14 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected +$30 per submission: 0.5% of 3,130 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($3,738), and a PSA 9 ($752) still clears the $589 you have in it. Confidence high on that sample.
$183$752$3,738$406+$3,1490.5%+$303,130
high
9Ho-ohHo-ohNeo Revelation #7 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected +$30 per submission: 1.4% of 3,583 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($1,925), and a PSA 9 ($770) still clears the $538 you have in it. Confidence high on that sample.
$300$770$1,925$238+$1,3871.4%+$303,583
high
10Ho-ohHo-ohNeo Revelation #18 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected +$25 per submission: 17.9% of 413 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($430), and only a PSA 10 covers the $104 you have in it — a 9 loses money. Confidence high on that sample.
$20$100$430$84+$32617.9%+$25413
high
11RaichuRaichuNeo Revelation #21 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected +$23 per submission: 25.6% of 219 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($350), and only a PSA 10 covers the $99 you have in it — a 9 loses money. Confidence high on that sample.
$16$65$350$83+$25125.6%+$23219
high
12RaikouRaikouNeo Revelation #13 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected +$18 per submission: 0.6% of 2,896 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($3,104), and a PSA 9 ($595) still clears the $561 you have in it. Confidence high on that sample.
$161$595$3,104$400+$2,5420.6%+$182,896
high
13StarmieStarmieNeo Revelation #25 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected +$1 per submission: 31.7% of 104 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($215), and only a PSA 10 covers the $91 you have in it — a 9 loses money. Confidence high on that sample.
$9$41$215$82+$12431.7%+$1104
high
14SuicuneSuicuneNeo Revelation #27 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected +$-0 per submission: 22.6% of 336 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($350), and only a PSA 10 covers the $108 you have in it — a 9 loses money. Confidence high on that sample.
$25$43$350$83+$24222.6%+$0336
high
15CelebiCelebiNeo Revelation #16 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected loss −$2 per submission: 21% of 248 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($293), and only a PSA 10 covers the $103 you have in it — a 9 loses money. Confidence high on that sample.
$20$75$293$83+$19021%−$2248
high
16RaikouRaikouNeo Revelation #22 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected loss −$7 per submission: 20.7% of 338 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($277), and only a PSA 10 covers the $100 you have in it — a 9 loses money. Confidence high on that sample.
$17$57$277$83+$17820.7%−$7338
high
17Porygon2Porygon2Neo Revelation #12 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected loss −$18 per submission: 0.9% of 957 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($2,130), and a PSA 9 ($205) still clears the $290 you have in it. Confidence high on that sample.
$50$205$2,130$240+$1,8400.9%−$18957
high
18EnteiEnteiNeo Revelation #17 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected loss −$24 per submission: 18.8% of 335 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($180), and only a PSA 10 covers the $101 you have in it — a 9 loses money. Confidence high on that sample.
$19$75$180$82+$7918.8%−$24335
high
19Pokémon Breeder FieldsPokémon Breeder FieldsNeo Revelation #62 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected loss −$25 per submission: 39.4% of 66 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($128), and only a PSA 10 covers the $86 you have in it — a 9 loses money. Confidence medium on that sample.
$5$25$128$81+$4139.4%−$2566
medium
20JumpluffJumpluffNeo Revelation #9 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected loss −$28 per submission: 2.8% of 703 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($572), and only a PSA 10 covers the $122 you have in it — a 9 loses money. Confidence high on that sample.
$36$102$572$86+$4502.8%−$28703
high
21DelibirdDelibirdNeo Revelation #5 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected loss −$31 per submission: 3.5% of 737 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($1,074), and only a PSA 10 covers the $171 you have in it — a 9 loses money. Confidence high on that sample.
$60$95$1,074$111+$9043.5%−$31737
high
22JynxJynxNeo Revelation #31 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected loss −$31 per submission: 21.4% of 56 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($166), and only a PSA 10 covers the $87 you have in it — a 9 loses money. Confidence medium on that sample.
$5$42$166$82+$7921.4%−$3156
medium
23SudowoodoSudowoodoNeo Revelation #26 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected loss −$32 per submission: 17.9% of 67 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($97), and only a PSA 10 covers the $91 you have in it — a 9 loses money. Confidence medium on that sample.
$10$65$97$81+$617.9%−$3267
medium
24SneaselSneaselNeo Revelation #24 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected loss −$33 per submission: 33.3% of 72 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($145), and only a PSA 10 covers the $96 you have in it — a 9 loses money. Confidence medium on that sample.
$15$35$145$81+$4833.3%−$3372
medium
25MagnetonMagnetonNeo Revelation #10 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected loss −$37 per submission: 1.6% of 871 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($1,111), and only a PSA 10 covers the $146 you have in it — a 9 loses money. Confidence high on that sample.
$35$101$1,111$111+$9651.6%−$37871
high
26AerodactylAerodactylNeo Revelation #15 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected loss −$39 per submission: 19.4% of 165 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($127), and only a PSA 10 covers the $103 you have in it — a 9 loses money. Confidence high on that sample.
$22$70$127$81+$2419.4%−$39165
high
27KingdraKingdraNeo Revelation #19 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected loss −$44 per submission: 30.7% of 101 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($95), and only a PSA 10 covers the $92 you have in it — a 9 loses money. Confidence high on that sample.
$11$45$95$81+$330.7%−$44101
high
28AmpharosAmpharosNeo Revelation #1 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected loss −$50 per submission: 0.2% of 1,103 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($1,372), and a PSA 9 ($266) still clears the $193 you have in it. Confidence high on that sample.
$79$266$1,372$114+$1,1790.2%−$501,103
high
29BlisseyBlisseyNeo Revelation #2 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected loss −$92 per submission: 0.1% of 1,002 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($1,891), and only a PSA 10 covers the $339 you have in it — a 9 loses money. Confidence high on that sample.
$101$167$1,891$238+$1,5530.1%−$921,002
high
30CrobatCrobatNeo Revelation #4 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected loss −$96 per submission: 3.3% of 663 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($192), and only a PSA 10 covers the $177 you have in it — a 9 loses money. Confidence high on that sample.
$95$97$192$82+$153.3%−$96663
high

Expected = every grade outcome weighted by its share of the card's graded population, minus the raw price and the grading cost (PSA tier fee for the graded value plus ~$20 round-trip shipping, fees as of 2026-09-26). Best case is the PSA 10 leg alone. Gem rates come from a self-selected population — collectors grade their cleanest copies — so read them as an upper bound. Raw is a blended market price, not a sale of your copy. Full method and filters on the grading index.

How to read the Neo Revelation ranking

Every Neo Revelation card listed here clears one bar: its PSA 10 price beats its raw price by more than the cost of grading it. 30 cards from the set pass. 30 of them (100%) have a gem-rate sample of at least ten graded copies in the population reports, and 13 of those keep a positive expected value once every grade outcome is weighted by how often the card actually receives it.

The order is expected profit, not the PSA 10 best case, which rewards the widest raw-to-gem gap whether the card gems one time in two or one in fifty. Here the top row, the Shining Magikarp from Neo Revelation, gems 1% of the time across 6,842 graded copies: +$170 is what a long run of submissions would average, $23,916 is what one lucky copy returns.

The median gem rate across the sampled Neo Revelation cards is 13%. Roughly one submitted copy in 8 came back PSA 10, and most rows here need that PSA 10 to cover raw price plus fee, so the gem rate decides whether a submission pays. Of the 30 ranked cards, 11 still cover raw price plus fee at PSA 9, 19 need a 10 to break even and 16 lose money on expectation. 25 rest on a hundred or more graded copies.

Before you submit a Neo Revelation card

Grading pays on condition. The four things every grader scores — centering, corners, edges and surface — can be checked at home before paying a fee, and a copy that is visibly off-centre or has a whitened corner will not gem whatever the population says. Those gem rates come from a self-selected population of clean copies, so a random copy does worse.

The cost column assumes a PSA submission at the tier covering the card's PSA 10 value, fees as of 2026-09-26, and raw is CardTrack's blended near-mint price, not a sale of your copy: pay more, or hold a lighter copy, and the break-even moves against you. Test a card with your own numbers in the ROI calculator, see the printings that fail the bar on the Neo Revelation card list, or see how gem-mint premiums run across the whole catalogue on the PSA premium index.

Neo Revelation grading questions

Which Neo Revelation card is the best to grade?
On current numbers the Shining Magikarp (Neo Revelation #66): 1% of 6,842 graded copies came back PSA 10, an expected profit of $170 per submission after the $2,289 grading cost, against a best case of $23,916 if it gems.
How many Neo Revelation cards are worth grading?
13 keep a positive expected value after the fee, out of the 30 with a gem-rate sample of at least ten graded copies. 30 cards on this page have a PSA 10 price that beats the raw price by more than the grading fee.
What gem rate do Neo Revelation cards get at PSA?
The median across the 30 sampled Neo Revelation cards is 13%, so about one in 8 of the copies collectors chose to submit came back PSA 10. The strongest rate with a sample of thirty or more is the Quagsire (Neo Revelation #48) at 46.5% of 86.
Does the Neo Revelation ranking apply to CGC or Beckett?
Not directly. The cost column is PSA's fee as of 2026-09-26 and the graded columns are PSA slab prices; the gem-rate sample falls back to CGC's population only when PSA has fewer than ten copies. A CGC or Beckett submission has its own fee and resale price.