cardtrack

Best Smeargle Cards to Grade

The Smeargle cards worth grading, ranked by expected profit per submission — every grade outcome weighted by how often the card actually receives it — after current grading fees. The PSA 10 best case is shown on every row but does not decide the order. Top pick: Smeargle (Call of Legends) at an expected +$2,096.

Worth grading6
With a gem-rate sample6100%
Positive expected value4
Median gem rate15.5%
PSA fees as of2026-09-26

Ranked by expected profit 6

Smeargle cards worth grading, ranked by expected grading profit
#CardRawPSA 9PSA 10CostBest caseGem rateExpectedSample
1SmeargleSmeargleCall of Legends #21 · Modern (2011–2019)
Expected +$2,096 per submission: 18.8% of 144 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($12,355), and a PSA 9 ($143) still clears the $1,155 you have in it. Confidence high on that sample.
$12$143$12,355$1,143+$11,20018.8%+$2,096144
high
2SmeargleSmeargleHS—Undaunted #8 · Classic (2004–2010)
Expected +$1,548 per submission: 6.8% of 118 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($24,750), and only a PSA 10 covers the $1,276 you have in it — a 9 loses money. Confidence high on that sample.
$9$61$24,750$1,267+$23,4756.8%+$1,548118
high
3SmeargleSmeargleAquapolis #109 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected +$71 per submission: 40.2% of 87 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($374), and only a PSA 10 covers the $98 you have in it — a 9 loses money. Confidence medium on that sample.
$14$31$374$84+$27740.2%+$7187
medium
4SmeargleSmeargleNeo Discovery #11 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected +$40 per submission: 0.4% of 1,004 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($1,176), and a PSA 9 ($650) still clears the $167 you have in it. Confidence high on that sample.
$55$650$1,176$112+$1,0090.4%+$401,004
high
5SmeargleSmeargleNeo Discovery #30 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected loss −$29 per submission: 15.5% of 84 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($255), and only a PSA 10 covers the $93 you have in it — a 9 loses money. Confidence medium on that sample.
$10$40$255$83+$16215.5%−$2984
medium
6SmeargleSmeargleWizards Black Star Promos #32 · Vintage (1999–2003)
Expected loss −$41 per submission: 7.7% of 13 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($339), and only a PSA 10 covers the $99 you have in it — a 9 loses money. Confidence low on that sample.
$16$77$339$83+$2407.7%−$4113
low

Expected = every grade outcome weighted by its share of the card's graded population, minus the raw price and the grading cost (PSA tier fee for the graded value plus ~$20 round-trip shipping, fees as of 2026-09-26). Best case is the PSA 10 leg alone. Gem rates come from a self-selected population — collectors grade their cleanest copies — so read them as an upper bound. Raw is a blended market price, not a sale of your copy. Full method and filters on the grading index.

How to read the Smeargle ranking

Every Smeargle card listed here clears one bar: its PSA 10 price beats its raw price by more than the cost of grading it. 6 Smeargle printings pass. 6 of them (100%) have a gem-rate sample of at least ten graded copies in the population reports, and 4 of those keep a positive expected value once every grade outcome is weighted by how often the card actually receives it.

The order is expected profit, not the PSA 10 best case, which rewards the widest raw-to-gem gap whether the card gems one time in two or one in fifty. Here the top row, the Smeargle from Call of Legends, gems 18.8% of the time across 144 graded copies: +$2,096 is what a long run of submissions would average, $11,200 is what one lucky copy returns.

The median gem rate across the sampled Smeargle cards is 15.5%. Roughly one submitted copy in 6 came back PSA 10, and most rows here need that PSA 10 to cover raw price plus fee, so the gem rate decides whether a submission pays. Of the 6 ranked cards, 2 still cover raw price plus fee at PSA 9, 4 need a 10 to break even and 2 lose money on expectation. 3 rest on a hundred or more graded copies.

Before you submit a Smeargle card

Grading pays on condition. The four things every grader scores — centering, corners, edges and surface — can be checked at home before paying a fee, and a copy that is visibly off-centre or has a whitened corner will not gem whatever the population says. Those gem rates come from a self-selected population of clean copies, so a random copy does worse.

The cost column assumes a PSA submission at the tier covering the card's PSA 10 value, fees as of 2026-09-26, and raw is CardTrack's blended near-mint price, not a sale of your copy: pay more, or hold a lighter copy, and the break-even moves against you. Test a card with your own numbers in the ROI calculator, see the printings that fail the bar on the Smeargle card list, or see how gem-mint premiums run across the whole catalogue on the PSA premium index.

Smeargle grading questions

Which Smeargle card is the best to grade?
On current numbers the Smeargle (Call of Legends #21): 18.8% of 144 graded copies came back PSA 10, an expected profit of $2,096 per submission after the $1,143 grading cost, against a best case of $11,200 if it gems.
How many Smeargle cards are worth grading?
4 keep a positive expected value after the fee, out of the 6 with a gem-rate sample of at least ten graded copies. 6 cards on this page have a PSA 10 price that beats the raw price by more than the grading fee.
What gem rate do Smeargle cards get at PSA?
The median across the 6 sampled Smeargle cards is 15.5%, so about one in 6 of the copies collectors chose to submit came back PSA 10. The strongest rate with a sample of thirty or more is the Smeargle (Aquapolis #109) at 40.2% of 87.
Does the Smeargle ranking apply to CGC or Beckett?
Not directly. The cost column is PSA's fee as of 2026-09-26 and the graded columns are PSA slab prices; the gem-rate sample falls back to CGC's population only when PSA has fewer than ten copies. A CGC or Beckett submission has its own fee and resale price.