cardtrack

Best Pokémon cards to grade

Ranked by expected profit per submissionevery grade outcome weighted by how often the card actually receives it in the PSA population — after current grading fees. The PSA 10 best case is on every row, but it no longer decides the order: a card that gems one time in twenty is not a better bet than one that gems one time in three. Top pick: Giratina ◇ at an expected +$340.

Cards worth grading4,797
With a gem-rate sample4,50794% of the population
Positive expected value2,819
Median gem rate18.3%
PSA fees as of2026-08-26
Reset

Ranked by expected profit42 matching

Cards worth grading, ranked by expected grading profit
#CardRawPSA 9PSA 10CostBest caseGem rateExpectedSample
1Giratina ◇Giratina ◇Ultra Prism #58 · Modern (2011–2019)
Expected +$340 per submission: 19.5% of 487 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($2,000), and a PSA 9 ($114) still clears the $209 you have in it. Confidence high on that sample.
$20$114$2,000$189+$1,79119.5%+$340487
high
2LillieLillieUltra Prism #151 · Modern (2011–2019)
Expected +$317 per submission: 33.4% of 4,090 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($1,430), and a PSA 9 ($465) still clears the $463 you have in it. Confidence high on that sample.
$349$465$1,430$114+$96733.4%+$3174,090
high
3Darkrai ◇Darkrai ◇Ultra Prism #77 · Modern (2011–2019)
Expected +$186 per submission: 18.7% of 375 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($1,100), and a PSA 9 ($155) still clears the $130 you have in it. Confidence high on that sample.
$19$155$1,100$111+$97018.7%+$186375
high
4Palkia-GXPalkia-GXUltra Prism #165 · Modern (2011–2019)
Expected +$150 per submission: 40.4% of 737 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($600), and only a PSA 10 covers the $157 you have in it — a 9 loses money. Confidence high on that sample.
$51$90$600$106+$44340.4%+$150737
high
5Leafeon-GXLeafeon-GXUltra Prism #157 · Modern (2011–2019)
Expected +$129 per submission: 45.7% of 1,208 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($518), and only a PSA 10 covers the $195 you have in it — a 9 loses money. Confidence high on that sample.
$90$150$518$105+$32345.7%+$1291,208
high
6Dialga-GXDialga-GXUltra Prism #164 · Modern (2011–2019)
Expected +$114 per submission: 43.4% of 876 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($510), and only a PSA 10 covers the $157 you have in it — a 9 loses money. Confidence high on that sample.
$52$56$510$105+$35343.4%+$114876
high
7CynthiaCynthiaUltra Prism #148 · Modern (2011–2019)
Expected +$107 per submission: 39.1% of 1,976 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($795), and only a PSA 10 covers the $353 you have in it — a 9 loses money. Confidence high on that sample.
$245$243$795$108+$44239.1%+$1071,976
high
8Palkia-GXPalkia-GXUltra Prism #147 · Modern (2011–2019)
Expected +$81 per submission: 40.2% of 356 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($375), and only a PSA 10 covers the $99 you have in it — a 9 loses money. Confidence high on that sample.
$25$60$375$74+$27640.2%+$81356
high
9Leafeon-GXLeafeon-GXUltra Prism #139 · Modern (2011–2019)
Expected +$67 per submission: 44.2% of 663 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($350), and only a PSA 10 covers the $117 you have in it — a 9 loses money. Confidence high on that sample.
$44$53$350$73+$23344.2%+$67663
high
10Dialga-GXDialga-GXUltra Prism #146 · Modern (2011–2019)
Expected +$67 per submission: 41.1% of 419 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($306), and only a PSA 10 covers the $95 you have in it — a 9 loses money. Confidence high on that sample.
$22$70$306$73+$21141.1%+$67419
high
11Lunala ◇Lunala ◇Ultra Prism #62 · Modern (2011–2019)
Expected +$62 per submission: 24.7% of 166 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($500), and only a PSA 10 covers the $82 you have in it — a 9 loses money. Confidence high on that sample.
$7$26$500$75+$41824.7%+$62166
high
12Solgaleo-GXSolgaleo-GXUltra Prism #173 · Modern (2011–2019)
Expected +$59 per submission: 36.4% of 868 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($300), and only a PSA 10 covers the $101 you have in it — a 9 loses money. Confidence high on that sample.
$28$90$300$73+$19936.4%+$59868
high
13Glaceon-GXGlaceon-GXUltra Prism #141 · Modern (2011–2019)
Expected +$52 per submission: 42.8% of 603 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($340), and only a PSA 10 covers the $120 you have in it — a 9 loses money. Confidence high on that sample.
$47$51$340$73+$22042.8%+$52603
high
14Lunala-GXLunala-GXUltra Prism #172 · Modern (2011–2019)
Expected +$51 per submission: 47.2% of 844 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($250), and only a PSA 10 covers the $110 you have in it — a 9 loses money. Confidence high on that sample.
$38$99$250$72+$14047.2%+$51844
high
15Glaceon-GXGlaceon-GXUltra Prism #159 · Modern (2011–2019)
Expected +$34 per submission: 45.2% of 1,042 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($328), and only a PSA 10 covers the $159 you have in it — a 9 loses money. Confidence high on that sample.
$86$86$328$73+$16845.2%+$341,042
high
16Pheromosa-GXPheromosa-GXUltra Prism #158 · Modern (2011–2019)
Expected +$34 per submission: 53.1% of 290 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($204), and only a PSA 10 covers the $93 you have in it — a 9 loses money. Confidence high on that sample.
$21$54$204$72+$11153.1%+$34290
high
17Dusk Mane Necrozma-GXDusk Mane Necrozma-GXUltra Prism #163 · Modern (2011–2019)
Expected +$31 per submission: 44.4% of 387 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($249), and only a PSA 10 covers the $97 you have in it — a 9 loses money. Confidence high on that sample.
$25$39$249$72+$15144.4%+$31387
high
18Xurkitree-GXXurkitree-GXUltra Prism #160 · Modern (2011–2019)
Expected +$23 per submission: 48.8% of 217 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($219), and only a PSA 10 covers the $103 you have in it — a 9 loses money. Confidence high on that sample.
$31$40$219$72+$11648.8%+$23217
high
19MarsMarsUltra Prism #154 · Modern (2011–2019)
Expected +$15 per submission: 40.1% of 927 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($271), and only a PSA 10 covers the $134 you have in it — a 9 loses money. Confidence high on that sample.
$61$80$271$73+$13740.1%+$15927
high
20Dawn Wings Necrozma-GXDawn Wings Necrozma-GXUltra Prism #161 · Modern (2011–2019)
Expected +$11 per submission: 42.1% of 330 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($209), and only a PSA 10 covers the $99 you have in it — a 9 loses money. Confidence high on that sample.
$27$38$209$72+$11042.1%+$11330
high
21Dawn Wings Necrozma-GXDawn Wings Necrozma-GXUltra Prism #143 · Modern (2011–2019)
Expected +$6 per submission: 35.9% of 198 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($200), and only a PSA 10 covers the $88 you have in it — a 9 loses money. Confidence high on that sample.
$16$40$200$72+$11235.9%+$6198
high
22Palkia-GXPalkia-GXUltra Prism #101 · Modern (2011–2019)
Expected +$5 per submission: 50.6% of 340 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($126), and only a PSA 10 covers the $79 you have in it — a 9 loses money. Confidence high on that sample.
$8$50$126$71+$4750.6%+$5340
high
23Glaceon-GXGlaceon-GXUltra Prism #39 · Modern (2011–2019)
Expected +$4 per submission: 50.6% of 549 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($145), and only a PSA 10 covers the $83 you have in it — a 9 loses money. Confidence high on that sample.
$12$35$145$71+$6150.6%+$4549
high
24Dusk Mane Necrozma-GXDusk Mane Necrozma-GXUltra Prism #145 · Modern (2011–2019)
Expected +$3 per submission: 39.9% of 291 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($180), and only a PSA 10 covers the $88 you have in it — a 9 loses money. Confidence high on that sample.
$16$35$180$72+$9239.9%+$3291
high
25Celesteela-GXCelesteela-GXUltra Prism #162 · Modern (2011–2019)
Expected +$0 per submission: 41.8% of 273 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($200), and only a PSA 10 covers the $99 you have in it — a 9 loses money. Confidence high on that sample.
$27$40$200$72+$10141.8%+$0273
high
26LusamineLusamineUltra Prism #153 · Modern (2011–2019)
Expected loss −$2 per submission: 44.2% of 1,595 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($360), and only a PSA 10 covers the $233 you have in it — a 9 loses money. Confidence high on that sample.
$159$130$360$74+$12844.2%−$21,595
high
27Pokémon Fan ClubPokémon Fan ClubUltra Prism #155 · Modern (2011–2019)
Expected loss −$2 per submission: 46.9% of 539 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($169), and only a PSA 10 covers the $119 you have in it — a 9 loses money. Confidence high on that sample.
$47$86$169$72+$5046.9%−$2539
high
28Dialga-GXDialga-GXUltra Prism #100 · Modern (2011–2019)
Expected loss −$9 per submission: 47.9% of 426 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($115), and only a PSA 10 covers the $82 you have in it — a 9 loses money. Confidence high on that sample.
$11$40$115$71+$3347.9%−$9426
high
29Xurkitree-GXXurkitree-GXUltra Prism #142 · Modern (2011–2019)
Expected loss −$10 per submission: 47.1% of 138 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($126), and only a PSA 10 covers the $86 you have in it — a 9 loses money. Confidence high on that sample.
$15$35$126$71+$4047.1%−$10138
high
30Celesteela-GXCelesteela-GXUltra Prism #144 · Modern (2011–2019)
Expected loss −$16 per submission: 43% of 135 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($113), and only a PSA 10 covers the $83 you have in it — a 9 loses money. Confidence high on that sample.
$12$36$113$71+$3043%−$16135
high
31LanaLanaUltra Prism #150 · Modern (2011–2019)
Expected loss −$19 per submission: 32.2% of 867 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($225), and only a PSA 10 covers the $117 you have in it — a 9 loses money. Confidence high on that sample.
$45$40$225$72+$10732.2%−$19867
high
32LookerLookerUltra Prism #152 · Modern (2011–2019)
Expected loss −$20 per submission: 48.6% of 278 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($101), and only a PSA 10 covers the $88 you have in it — a 9 loses money. Confidence high on that sample.
$17$42$101$71+$1348.6%−$20278
high
33Missing CloverMissing CloverUltra Prism #168 · Modern (2011–2019)
Expected loss −$23 per submission: 44.5% of 155 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($95), and only a PSA 10 covers the $81 you have in it — a 9 loses money. Confidence high on that sample.
$10$35$95$71+$1444.5%−$23155
high
34Leafeon-GXLeafeon-GXUltra Prism #13 · Modern (2011–2019)
Expected loss −$26 per submission: 48.6% of 486 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($84), and only a PSA 10 covers the $81 you have in it — a 9 loses money. Confidence high on that sample.
$10$30$84$71+$448.6%−$26486
high
35Peeking Red CardPeeking Red CardUltra Prism #169 · Modern (2011–2019)
Expected loss −$28 per submission: 43.2% of 139 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($90), and only a PSA 10 covers the $78 you have in it — a 9 loses money. Confidence high on that sample.
$7$21$90$71+$1243.2%−$28139
high
36Dusk Mane Necrozma-GXDusk Mane Necrozma-GXUltra Prism #90 · Modern (2011–2019)
Expected loss −$29 per submission: 20.7% of 92 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($195), and only a PSA 10 covers the $78 you have in it — a 9 loses money. Confidence medium on that sample.
$6$15$195$72+$11720.7%−$2992
medium
37Pheromosa-GXPheromosa-GXUltra Prism #140 · Modern (2011–2019)
Expected loss −$31 per submission: 44.6% of 166 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($120), and only a PSA 10 covers the $94 you have in it — a 9 loses money. Confidence high on that sample.
$23$17$120$71+$2644.6%−$31166
high
38Unit Energy GrassFireWaterUnit Energy GrassFireWaterUltra Prism #170 · Modern (2011–2019)
Expected loss −$38 per submission: 34.7% of 242 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($102), and only a PSA 10 covers the $90 you have in it — a 9 loses money. Confidence high on that sample.
$19$30$102$71+$1234.7%−$38242
high
39GardeniaGardeniaUltra Prism #149 · Modern (2011–2019)
Expected loss −$38 per submission: 37.2% of 907 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($140), and only a PSA 10 covers the $128 you have in it — a 9 loses money. Confidence high on that sample.
$57$72$140$71+$1137.2%−$38907
high
40VolknerVolknerUltra Prism #156 · Modern (2011–2019)
Expected loss −$40 per submission: 38% of 295 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($129), and only a PSA 10 covers the $101 you have in it — a 9 loses money. Confidence high on that sample.
$30$19$129$71+$2738%−$40295
high
41Unit Energy LightningPsychicMetalUnit Energy LightningPsychicMetalUltra Prism #171 · Modern (2011–2019)
Expected loss −$45 per submission: 25.9% of 197 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($146), and only a PSA 10 covers the $85 you have in it — a 9 loses money. Confidence high on that sample.
$14$1$146$71+$6125.9%−$45197
high
42LusamineLusamineUltra Prism #153a · Modern (2011–2019)
Expected loss −$62 per submission: 4.2% of 24 graded copies came back PSA 10 ($204), and only a PSA 10 covers the $110 you have in it — a 9 loses money. Confidence low on that sample.
$38$42$204$72+$944.2%−$6224
low

How the ranking works — and where it can mislead

Expected profit = (gem rate × PSA 10) + (PSA 9 rate × PSA 9) + (sub-9 rate × the card's own sub-9 prices) − raw pricegrading cost. Best case is the PSA 10 leg alone. Grading cost is the PSA tier fee for the graded value plus roughly $20 round-trip shipping, at fees as of 2026-08-26; the paused PSA Value tier is excluded and membership is not included.

Population selection bias. Gem rates are the share of the graded population at PSA 10 (PSA population report; CGC's when PSA has fewer than 10 copies). That population is self-selected: collectors grade their cleanest copies, and near misses get cracked and resubmitted, so it overstates what a random raw copy would achieve. Read a gem rate as an upper bound, and read it against its sample — confidence is high from 100, medium from 30, low from 10 graded copies; under 10, the card is shown as best-case only rather than ranked.

Prices. Raw is CardTrack's blended near-mint price for the exact printing; PSA 9 and PSA 10 come from the card's graded price ladder, with a PSA 9 estimated at 0.4× the 10 when the ladder has no 9. Where the ladder has no price for a lower grade, that leg is valued at raw. None of this is a sold price for your copy — it is a model of what the market has paid, and grading outcomes are not guaranteed.

PSA grading standards

Centering is the one criterion PSA publishes as a hard number, so it is the only part of a grade you can check yourself before paying. The ratios below are the widest border PSA allows at each grade — a card is judged on its worse axis, and the reverse is graded too. Meeting the centering limit does not earn the grade: corners, edges and surface all still have to hold up.

GradeFrontBackWhat the card looks like
PSA 10 GEM-MT55/4575/25Effectively flawless to the naked eye. Four sharp corners, clean edges, full original gloss and no staining. A minor printing flaw can survive if it does not hurt the card's overall look, but wear cannot — this is the grade where centering is tightest and most 10 attempts fail.
PSA 9 MINT60/4090/10Mint to the eye, with one small permitted flaw: a faint surface imperfection, a tiny printing blemish, or slightly off-white borders. Corners and edges still look sharp. The usual difference between a 9 and a 10 is centering or a single point of very light wear.
PSA 8 NM-MT65/3590/10Very light wear that needs looking for. Typically one slightly fuzzy corner, a minor surface mark, or minimally off-white borders. Still presents as a clean card at arm's length.
PSA 7 NM70/3090/10Light wear that is visible without hunting for it — slight fraying at a corner or two, minor surface wear, or a small loss of gloss. No creasing.
PSA 6 EX-MT80/2090/10Obvious but modest handling. Corners show visible rounding, edges show wear, and the surface may have lost some gloss. Colour is still strong and the card is free of creases.
PSA 5 EX85/1590/10Clearly played. Rounded corners, noticeable edge wear and some surface scuffing, with colour beginning to dull. Still whole and presentable.
PSA 4 VG-EX85/1590/10Well handled. Corner rounding is pronounced, surface wear is easy to see, and a very light crease may be present without dropping the card further.
PSA 3 VG90/1090/10Heavy handling. Rounded corners, dulled colour, scuffing or scratching, and light creasing. The card reads as used rather than collected.
PSA 2 GOOD90/1090/10Substantial wear throughout — heavy corner rounding, creasing, surface damage or writing. Intact and identifiable, but plainly worn.
PSA 1.5 FR90/1090/10Severe wear, stopping short of destroyed. Heavy creasing, major surface loss or damage, but the card is complete with no missing pieces.
PSA 1 PRThe floor. Extreme damage — major creasing, staining, tears, missing paper or pieces. Graded so the card can be authenticated and slabbed at all, not because condition is being certified.

Qualifiers

When a single defect is the only thing holding a card back, PSA can grade it with a qualifier — a slab reading PSA 8 (OC) rather than dropping to a 6. Qualified cards usually trade below an unqualified card of the same number, so the letters matter when you are pricing one.

  • OCOff-Centre: Centering is outside the tolerance for the grade the card would otherwise earn.
  • STStaining: A stain the card is otherwise clean enough to have avoided.
  • PDPrint Defect: A flaw introduced when the card was printed, not by handling.
  • OFOut of Focus: The image itself was printed soft — a manufacturing fault, not wear.
  • MKMarks: Ink or pencil marks on the card.
  • MCMiscut: Cut outside the intended borders at the factory.

Grade criteria and centering tolerances are published by PSA. Summaries here are ours. See the official PSA grading standards for the authoritative text.

Grading FAQ

Which Pokémon cards are worth grading?

The cards whose expected graded value — PSA 10, PSA 9 and lower grades each weighted by how often that card actually receives them — beats the raw price plus the grading fee. Right now that is led by Giratina ◇ (Ultra Prism) at an expected +$340 per submission.

How is expected grading profit calculated?

Expected value = (gem rate × PSA 10 price) + (PSA 9 rate × PSA 9 price) + (sub-9 rate × the card's own sub-9 prices) − raw price − grading cost. Rates come from the PSA population report (CGC when PSA has fewer than 10 copies); the grading cost is the PSA tier fee for the graded value plus roughly $20 round-trip shipping, at fees as of 2026-08-26.

Why is a card with a huge PSA 10 price not at the top?

Because a PSA 10 price only matters as often as the card gems. A card with fewer than 10 graded copies has no measurable gem rate, so it is listed separately as best-case only rather than ranked above cards with evidence.

Are gem rates reliable?

They are the share of the graded population at PSA 10, and that population is self-selected: people grade their cleanest copies and crack-and-resubmit near misses. Treat the gem rate as an upper bound for a random raw copy, and weight the sample size — the confidence label on each row reflects it.